Laserfiche WebLink
requirement kicks in. So it creates thatkind of option. Whereas leaving the property under its <br />existing zoning would not allow you, provide you with that kind of opportunities. So, having <br />said that, I€m prepared to answer any questions the Commission may have. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioners? Commissioner Springer? <br />SPRINGER: I guess this is to Mr. Fuke and the staff as well. Condition I has been <br />amended, is that correct? <br />FUKE:That is correct <br />SPRINGER:And the purpose of that amendment is to -? <br />FUKE:It€s just to make sure that, you know, like portions of the property fall <br />withintheAEfloodwayzone;andit€sjusttomakeclearthatnostructureswouldbeallowedin <br />that area, although a portion of an existing structure already occurs in that area. But any <br />expansion or any teardown of any new construction of structures cannot occur until first there is <br />a, what has been suggested over here, an amendment to the flood zone map. And only after that <br />occurs, then, of course, the structure would be allowed. So I think it makes clear and it provides <br />adequate protection for the owner and subsequent owners of the property with having this <br />condition in. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. May I continue? <br />ALAMEDA:Sure. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Fuke, an amendment to the Flood Zone Map, what€s the time frame <br />for that? <br />FUKE:Probably like I€d say about a year, a year and a half. What you need is <br />like you need to have an engineer come up with a study to show like how the flood waters are <br />going in that area, and then it has to be reviewed and recommended for approval by the County <br />Department of Public Works, who then forwards it to the US Corps of Engineers for <br />consideration and formal amendments. <br />SPRINGER:One last question. So that extends the planning timeline for this project? <br />FUKE:Correct, again, only if the applicant elects to construct any structures <br />within that area. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Siracusa. <br />SIRACUSA:Is there a sort of conflict there between Condition I which talks about no <br />additional structures and Condition M which discusses developing additional residential units on <br />the property, or are we assuming that they can go up? <br />4EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />