|
CARDOZA:Oh, Lalakea.
<br />KIM:Lalakea, okay, he would lose a huge section here. About an acre or so of
<br />his property would be lost; and that is in the deed that was sold to him. I would lose a bit of the
<br />top of my section, and the road would continue directly right down the middle of this section
<br />right here. However, they sold this property so thats not available right now. But in his deed, it
<br />says that he has, I mean, they have the option of buying this property from him and realigning
<br />the road here. As far as you can see this road here its less than a 45 degree angle cut back on
<br />itself. Two cars cannot pass this road at all. I mean, I dont care how small your car is, two cars
<br />cant pass this road; and theres a lot of heavy traffic moving up and down this road. So this
<br />section right here is, like I said, in that deed that was originally sold.
<br />Okay, and as far as like that major realignment that would, hopefully, bring up the road to
<br />County Code, which it is not now. Thats why they couldnt, I guess, give the road to the
<br />Countywhentheyoriginallytriedtodoitwhentheymadethesubdivision.Asfarastheroad
<br />issue, theres also a bend right at the top like where lots, I guess, the bottom two lots are, which
<br />is a blind downward turn. And any driveway coming off of that road right there, you know, is a
<br />major traffic hazard. I can see, you know, even night time or day time cars coming on that road
<br />and a car pulling out of that driveway, theres no sight lines on that road.
<br />Okay, lets see. As far as Ms. Siracusa had questioned earlier, you know, this is a prime Ag lot.
<br />I mean its a beautiful flat deep soil, you know, 20-foot plus deep soil lot, thats what it is. It has
<br />always been Ag. It was farmed Ag right up until it was purchased recently. And the zoning
<br />mistake that let this supposedly five lots be put into this, I mean, it was put there, say, by
<br />mistake. But its purely for speculation later on which is whats happening right now. I mean if
<br />you zone that, I mean if you split up this little sliver into that five lots, I mean, theyre very
<br />undesirable lots. You couldnt sell them really for, you know, what theyre trying to sell it for
<br />now, which is what it purely speculation I can see. And you can say that its going to be small,
<br />small farmer lots and stuff. But we all know thats its just going to be a residential 5-acre lots,
<br />you know; and you put a 35-foot high, you know, height requirement on this, 35 feet thats the
<br />Olympic pool diving tower. You know, thats 35 feet, its ridiculously high. You know, it
<br />doesnt fall into anything in that general area, 35 feet is. Like I said, that 35 feet height
<br />requirement doesnt really do anything to, you know, minimize impact of the sight zone, I mean,
<br />the sight lines.
<br />And as far as the Water Department putting in this line, from what I discussed with the Water
<br />Department, its the Water Department thats putting in the line, not the developer. And thats
<br />about it.
<br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Any questions for Mr. Kim? Commissioners? Commissioner
<br />Siracusa.
<br />SIRACUSA:Yes. You mentioned that is prime Ag land and its beautiful deep soil;
<br />and then you said that if it was broken up into five-acre lots they wouldnt be so good.
<br />KIM:No, what I -.
<br />SIRACUSA:Now could you, Im paraphrasing you.
<br />16EXHIBIT D
<br />
<br />
|