Laserfiche WebLink
KRUEGER:Mr. Chair, if it pleases the Commission, IÓd like to be able to <br />briefly address the same point that has been the subject of discussion between <br />Mr. Tsukazaki and the Commission. At the last hearing, there we <br />were being, and actually, it was one motion, and it was brought by the Applicant. The <br />motion was to ask someone on this Commission to bring a motion, <br />Commission can bring, whether that be a motion for reconsideration or a motion for <br />rescission of the prior action. It was determined at the last m <br />rules state that you have to bring a motion for reconsideration prior to the written <br />decision and Roberts Rules of Order say that it needs to be brought on the day of the <br />hearing, that a motion for reconsideration was not in order the last time around. Even if <br />any of you Commissioners wanted to bring that motion, it was too late to bring that <br />motion. So the focus of the discussion at that point became a motion to rescind, which is <br />an alternative to the, under Roberts Rules of Order to this motion to alter, or to amend <br />something previously adopted, that Mr. Tsukazaki has now asked you to consider raising <br />today. <br />But I think the point that your Corp. Counsel made at the last meeting that <br />Mr. Tsukazaki is referring to was after we took a break and after he spoke to someone in <br />the Hilo office, he came back and said that even though this was <br />rescind, that the attorney in Hilo that he spoke to said that it was really more of a motion <br />to alter or amend, which is what your counsel is telling you today is really the appropriate <br />motion for Mr. Tsukazaki to bring. And that required him to notice it, to properly <br />agendize it, and so forth. The motion that he brought at the last meeting to reconsider, to <br />ask the Commission to reconsider, or ask the Commission to rescind was properly <br />agendized and was properly before this Commission; and that was determined at the last <br />meeting as well. <br />So what Mr. Tsukazaki is saying is I would like one of you to bring that motion to <br />rescind so that it can be discussed. And at the last meeting nobody chose to bring that <br />motion, nobody, it died because nobody raised a motion. So the <br />today, is Mr. TsukazakiÓs request, again, to ask somebody here on the Commission to <br />rescind or to bring a motion to rescind an action that had previously been approved. <br />Mr. Tsukazaki, as the Applicant, canÓt bring that motion. The only way Mr. Tsukazaki <br />can bring that motion is under Rule 6-8, which is a motion to amend a condition that has <br />been previously adopted by this Commission. And if thatÓs the way he wants to go, I <br />mean if thatÓs what he wants to do, thatÓs his only means of doing that. The Commission <br />as a body can reconsider or can rescind an action that it has previously taken, but there <br />are certain restrictions on that as well under Roberts Rules of Order. And with respect to <br />the motion to amend something previously adopted, one of the restrictions on that is <br />when something has been done as a result of the vote on the main motion that itÓs <br />impossible to undo, then you canÓt rescind, or you canÓt reconsider the previous action. <br />And, in this case, there has been an appeal of this CommissionÓs decision which is <br />pending before Judge Ibarra in the Third Circuit. And I donÓt think that itÓll be <br />6 <br /> <br />