My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-12-04 TPuuLaniRanch
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-12-04 TPuuLaniRanch
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:07:53 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:07:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
linkage between the sales office, which is an existing very benign, actually attractive and <br />functional purpose, and this other agenda, which is to deal with burial treatment plans <br />that I think would affect a number of lots that are no longer owned by Puu Lani Ranch <br />Corporation. <br />Mr. Yuen spoke with me a little bit ago and suggested that his staff really has a need for a <br />map delineating where the burial sites are on the tax map, and I can understand that. And <br />IÓll discuss that with the company to see if, well, weÓd have to discuss that not only with <br />the developer but also with the lot owners to see if they would agree, if we were willin <br />to have the sites surveyed, if they would agree to give us access to do that. So, the <br />problem with a condition like this is we might not be able to satisfy this sort of a <br />condition because it is sufficiently unrelated to the request and itÓs unrelated to this <br />specific site. So itÓs kind of like asking us to, you know, install something off-site or do <br />something off-site or else we canÓt continue this existing sales office activity. So that <br />would be one of my problems with agreeing to a condition, is having you think that we <br />could comply with it, because IÓm not all sure that we can. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Yuen? <br />YUEN:We furnished this recommendation even though we knew thereÓs a <br />Contested Case and we know that most likely the Commission will have to deal with the <br />Contested Case today. The reason for furnishing this, despite the Contested Case, was to <br />give notice to the Applicant and the Commission that this is where the Department is <br />coming from in this situation because there has been an on-going long-term problem with <br />the subdivision that IÓll explain in just a minute. But we did want to give notice that this <br />is what we would want to see if we were to, if the Commission is to go ahead with this. <br />Also, being a time extension, if we, if you defer action for the Contested Case, unless the <br />permit is, unless we move to shut down the, the normal course of events would be that <br />the sales office would continue during the pendency of the Contested Case and, you <br />know, in effect that they would have the, what they want while the Contested Case is <br />going on, which could be some considerable period of time. <br />Let me explain the problem that happens with this subdivision. <br />Final Subdivision Approval, there is a condition that said that they should comply with <br />all the requirements of the State Historic Preservation Division. At that time there was a <br />correspondence from State Historic Preservation Division that the Applicant was <br />supposed to complete a burial treatment plan and archaeological <br />the sites that are on the property, specifically there are a number of burial sites on the <br />property and thereÓs an archaeological preservation site. This was back in Ó93-Ó94. You <br />should have a letter from SHPD that was written the last couple of days that explains this. <br />The Applicant, the developer of the subdivision did not do the burial treatment plan. <br />Instead, they pushed this off to their purchasers of their lots. As a result, and the <br />difficulty, the DepartmentÓs mistake was to allow this as a condition that would be done <br />after Final Subdivision Approval. Because when you get Final Subdivision Approval, <br />you can sell off the lots; and itÓs very difficult to then have a remedy against the <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.