My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-12-04 TCLIFTO120403
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-12-04 TCLIFTO120403
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:07:58 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:07:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
offices, retail uses, multi-family housing, facilities for transient accommodations and <br />related improvements. Norman? <br />HAYASHI:Thank you, Mr. Chair. Good morning, Commissioners. Just for <br />your information, the maps pertaining to this application are on the wall to my left. And <br />since all of you are familiar with the project, I would dispense with the description, going <br />through the description of the project. For your information, at its meeting of <br />th <br />November 7, the Planning Commission took action on this particular application for an <br />SMA Use Permit. The vote was to, the motion was to approve the request and that <br />particular motion did not pass. There were six Commissioners in attendance and the <br />vote was recorded as three ayes and three noes. As a result of this voting action, the <br />application was declared denied since there was no majority vote of five. <br />th <br />Since that time, per letter dated November 12 that was received in our office on the <br />same date, the ApplicantÓs representative, Mr. Sidney Fuke, had submitted a letter to the <br />Planning Commission Chair requesting that this action be reconsidered and, therefore, <br />this matter is brought before you today. <br />Since that meeting, we also received, based on the file that I have, we have received three <br />correspondences regarding this Petition. There may be others that may have been <br />submitted this morning that I donÓt have, that may be brought to your attention at a later <br />time. <br />First of all, this is a letter from James Sogi and, basically, stating that his organization, <br />which is Na Keiki Hei Nalu O Hawaii, is recommending denial of this particular SMA <br />request. <br />We also received a letter from Na Ala Hele, the Hawaii Trails and Access System, signed <br />by Irving Kawashima, requesting that the development work with the Hawaii Island <br />Advisory Council concerning ways to integrate the historic Mamahaloa Trail into the <br />future development of this area. <br />And, finally, we received a letter from Mr. Duane Erway, who wanted us to read this <br />particular letter into the record. However, since youÓve had an opportunity to review a <br />copy of this letter, I would dispense with it. Basically heÓs representing Plan to Protect <br />Kona; and theyÓre recommending that this particular request be denied. <br />Are there any questions at this time? <br />GALDONES:Commissioners, are there any questions of Norman? <br />SPRINGER:No, thank you. <br />GALDONES:Okay. Hearing none, will the Applicant or its representative please <br />come forward? Good morning, Mr. Fuke. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth on this <br />matter now before the Hawaii County Planning Commission? <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.