Laserfiche WebLink
Thank you. <br />GALDONES:Thank you, Mr. Kawashima. Commissioners, any questions of <br />Mr. Kawashima? Commissioner Springer? <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. Mr. Kawashima, as I read and have heard you <br />testimony, is that to say that the developer has not yet contacted the Na Ala Hele Program <br />for advice or guidance? <br />KAWASHIMA:IÓve just gotten into this position for about two months now and I <br />donÓt have any record. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Kawashima, do you have any response to the issue raised by <br />Ms. David and Chris YuenÓs response as far as the issue of the north side of the property <br />and that wedge created by the Mamalahoa Trail traversing the property? <br />KAWASHIMA:What is your question? What do you want to know about the <br />Mamalahoa Trail? <br />SPRINGER:What your response to Ms. DavidÓs concerns are about breaches to <br />the trail? <br />KAWASHIMA:I donÓt think the trail should be breached. I think the trail should <br />be left as is and that the public should have the right to use the trail going through the <br />development. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you, Mr. Kawashima. <br />KAWASHIMA:YouÓre welcome. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you, Mr. Chair. <br />GALDONES:Commissioners, there being no further questions, I will excuse the <br />testifiers. Mr. Fuke, you have heard the testifiers. Are there further comments? <br />FUKE:Well, I think in relation to the trail and the breach, I think the <br />Planning Director accurately reflected that. TheyÓre reflected also as conditions of <br />approval as proposed by the Planning Director, specifically, Conditions 28 and 33. <br />Proposed Condition 28 would not allow any additional breach with <br />appropriate consent from the State. And, so, the Director is correct in a sense that that <br />ÐwedgeÑ of property would have to find some alternative means of gaining access if no <br />additional breach is granted by the State. <br />Condition 33 requires that the Applicant prepare like a mitigation plan which would, <br />which addresses specifically the trail and the associated habitation cave which would be <br />still subject to the review and approval of the State Department of Land and Natural <br />23 <br /> <br />