2003-12-04 TCLIFTO120403 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

33, and IÓd just like some clarification, and theyÓre referenced both to Mamalahoa Trail and also the KingÓs Highway. Are these two different features? FUKE:No. ThatÓs one of the editorial changes. TheyÓre basically the same feature. SPRINGER:Thank you. FUKE:So the way that the Council had changed the, the Council Committee had changed that language and IÓll just read it to you. It reads, ÐAn archaeological preservation plan shall be prepared and submitted by the Department of Land and Natural Resources, Historic Preservation Division prior to receipt of Final Plan Approval. The archaeological preservation plan shall address the Mamalahoa Trail and associated habitation cave and ensure that they are not damaged by construction activities.Ñ So, essentially, they say the same thing but itÓs a little bit cleaner language. SPRINGER:Thank you. YUEN:If I could just comment on that. When we wrote the recommendation, we were under the misconception that there were two rights-of-way through there, that the Mamalahoa Trail and the KingÓs Trail were separate, and this is because the deed that the Applicant has on the property in 1986 identifies the KingÓs Highway as being the makai boundary of the property. The known feature, the well- known Mamalahoa Trail actually cuts through the property. So we did manage to verify that there isnÓt anything on the ground that, that there is no separate KingÓs Highway on the ground. The only thing that exists is the Mamalahoa Trail that cuts through the property. SPRINGER:Thank you. GALDONES:Commissioners -? Commissioner Kubota? KUBOTA:Yes, a couple of questions. Thank you. Mr. Hayashi, this project was for a rezoning from Light Industrial to Project District? HAYASHI:That is correct. KUBOTA:Okay. That was the rezoning that was requested. Okay. Within the Project District, is there any limitation as to transient room numbers that weÓre talking about? As I understand Mr. Fuke to say, the only unresolved thing between the Planning DirectorÓs recommendation and the ApplicantÓs is the 200 versus 400 transient rooms that are to be made available. Is there a cap on, in the Project District requirements? LetÓs say that you can go only so high? 6