Laserfiche WebLink
properties? You know I’m just wondering whether there was any analysis made, Mr. Fuke, by <br />your client given the fact that there was some recent Industrial zoning for, I think, a water <br />bottling company on that side of the highway, whether that would have been, perhaps, a more <br />appropriate route to go rather than the Family Ag 2. <br />FUKE: That was a consideration. However, that would have required like a <br />General Plan Amendment and perhaps some amendment to the Puna Community Development <br />Plan. <br />The other thing too is that in the, well, unlikely event that the project does not materialize then <br />having these two acre lots could still be used like Residentially Ag, Family Agricultural, you <br />know, which would be generally consistent with that area. Cause that area on the General Plan <br />as I understand is presently designated Low Density Urban. <br />WOODWARD: All right, any further questions? Okay, we have nobody signed up to <br />testify. Okay, do we have a motion? Commissioner Iwashita. <br />IWASHITA: With regard to Item No. 6 on the Agenda, Hawaii Brewery Development <br />Co., Inc., SPP 842, amendment to Condition 5 (construction timetable) of Special Permit No. <br />842, which allowed the establishment of a brewery, water and soft drink bottling facility on 14.5 <br />acres of land within the State Land Use Agricultural District, I move that the application be <br />approved. <br />WOODWARD: Okay, thank you. <br />DOMINGO: Second. <br />WOODWARD: Second? <br />DOMINGO: Yes. <br />WOODWARD: All right. We have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Okay, Jeff. <br />DARROW: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The motion before us is to approve this <br />amendment request for Special Permit 842. With that I’ll take the roll. Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA: Yes. <br />DARROW: Commissioner Domingo? <br />DOMINGO: Aye. <br />DARROW: Commissioner Ishibashi? <br />ISHIBASHI: Aye. <br />5 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />