My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-12-05 THWN RAINFOREST
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-12-05 THWN RAINFOREST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:09:42 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:09:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IWASHITA: I just want to make it clear in my mind, cause being a third person with a <br />tie in this room, that the Land Court, the rights for Land Court property are required to be <br />reflected on the Certificate of Title. <br />WATANABE: Hang on, transfer to Certificate of Title. <br />IWASHITA: On the Certificate of Title. So, and if it’s not there, and as the testifier <br />indicated today there are no access rights as indicated, there’s a dispute, and there’s a title claim <br />being made against the title carrier about correcting those problems, that’s all well and good. <br />But for our, you know, we’re not the body to resolve access issues. <br />WATANABE: Right. <br />IWASHITA: And if there is in fact no legal access on the record as required by law, <br />Land Court Statute, then I, you know, whatever the position -. And if it’s as easy as being <br />represented that it’s going to be corrected, then we can put this off for a month and come back <br />and it should be resolved; and then we can go forward. But until that’s done, we’re not the <br />forum to resolve the access issue. Until that’s -. <br />WATANABE: I think I made that clear earlier. <br />IWASHITA: Yeah. So my inclination is to continue this matter at least until the next <br />Hilo meeting and then resolve it, so that would be -. Would that be in time? I guess my <br />impression was that the 90 days might expire. <br />WATANABE: No, no. This is the first read of this. I don’t think that’s the issue. And <br />what we’re trying to do is get them to agree when to continue, in which case the 90-day is not <br />applicable anyway; and so -. <br />IWASHITA: Well, they can make it longer. <br />WATANABE: Yeah, right. And all I’m trying to get from the applicant is when do you <br />want to continue to. <br />IWASHITA: Okay. <br />WATANABE: That’s all I’m trying to get. <br />IWASHITA: Yeah, let’s resolve that. Thank you, Mr. Chair. <br />WATANABE: Yes, that’s all I want to get. Okay, when, next month, the following <br />month, whenever. <br />FUKE: Can we defer this until the next, your next available Hilo meeting? <br />WATANABE: Next available Hilo meeting will be good. Okay. <br />FUKE: During that time, we’ll, you know, attempt to resolve any access or related <br />issues, you know, with the Shipman interest and evaluate the propriety of either the special <br />permit or continuing with this application. <br />WATANABE: Okay, great, great. Thank you. So -. <br />BOWMAN: Mr. Chair? <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />20 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.