Laserfiche WebLink
rezoned to Ag-3, and 3 acre lots were then created. If I could get the slide up showing the State <br />Land Use boundaries -. If you note the purple areas, that’s State Land Use Urban. <br />There was a reference to Urban sprawl. And I’d like to point out that the area in question sits <br />between two Urban designated areas; and I would characterize it more as an in-filling of Urban <br />rather than, you know, sprawling out, because the boundary for Urban has extended beyond this <br />particular property in terms of its relationship to the center of town. And, you know, I think any <br />time an area is in transition there will be impacts felt, particularly to, you know, those families <br />that may not be ready for the type of change that is coming. But the point is, is that, you know, <br />at some point in time these changes are likely to occur. You know, the testimony provided has <br />indicated that they have already experienced increased traffic and increased number of people <br />that are coming to the area based on other uses that have already been established in the Panaewa <br />community; and I think that in the future that is like, you know, more than likely to increase. So <br />whether it is this applicant or other property owners in the area I think that these types of changes <br />will be occurring. <br />WATANABE: Okay. Mr. Nishimura, though, you know, they did discuss trees. And <br />I forgot what the specific name of species it was, but apparently those trees are volunteer trees <br />that have taken root on Mr. Sonomura’s property. And I’m thinking that because we have <br />Conditions D and E now added to that, and not so much that this applies in that manner, you <br />would probably want to take out those trees anyway if you develop that. Because you certainly, <br />if you have half acre lots, let’s say, you wouldn’t want to have a situation where Mr. Branco’s <br />cattle may be running into one of your subdivided lots and certainly you wouldn’t want to <br />contribute to that probability by having the trees so close to his fences, yeah? Is that reasonable? <br />NISHIMURA: I believe so, yes. <br />WATANABE: And would you concur also that property basically was all consisted of <br />fill so it’s pretty stony? <br />NISHIMURA: It appears that way. <br />WATANABE: Thank you. Do we have any -? Yes, Mr. Domingo. <br />DOMINGO: Yeah. Were you alluding to the fact that the developer will cut the <br />trees? <br />WATANABE: Right. I think it’s logical that the developer would cut the trees to <br />prevent, you know, an occurrence of fence breaking during high winds. <br />DOMINGO: Well, Mr. Chairman, that seems to have been one of the major <br />concerns about the trees often falling and breaking the fence and they have to repair it and the <br />animals, you know, getting loose. So having the developer cut the trees is I think the appropriate <br />-. <br />WATANABE: Well, that’s it, I don’t think it needs to be a condition though because I <br />think it stands to reason that he’s going to develop it that way. It just makes good sense for him <br />to do that to -. <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />13 <br /> <br />