Laserfiche WebLink
BOWMAN: So potentially they could apply for the same. I just see this as <br />precedent setting. Right? So if we have .5 acre there, which is still Land Use Ag, I mean, <br />there’s the potential for that Urban area to be expanded. <br />COTTLE: They could subdivide to a greater density, yes. <br />BOWMAN: Okay. And could you just tell me what the, cause I’m not familiar <br />with Hilo, sorry, those lots, are they all pretty much occupied? <br />COTTLE: The lots south of Makalika? <br />BOWMAN: Right, in that Urban area. <br />COTTLE: Yes, they are. <br />BOWMAN: Okay, thank you. <br />WATANABE: Any further discussion items? Well, let’s try -. We have I believe six <br />Commissioners here so why don’t we give it a shot. Would anybody? <br />IWASHITA: Seven. <br />WATANABE: Seven do we? <br />IWASHITA: Seven. <br />WATANABE: Oh, well, then we’ll have a better chance. Why don’t we give it a shot <br />then? Would someone care to make a motion? And I guess we would, the appropriate course of <br />action would be to address the State Land Use Boundary, I believe, first. So would anyone care <br />to make a motion? <br />DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman, one point of clarification. <br />WATANABE: Yes, Mr. Domingo. <br />DOMINGO: Even if we go to one-acre lots, it still has to be, its designation needs to <br />be still RA-1, 1 acre? <br />WATANABE: This is RA-.5 so the designation would change, I believe. And I think <br />-. Daryn, I believe the process starts all over, right? I don’t think you can just, you know, on the <br />fly change it. You’d have to turn this down, start all over again, renotice, etc. <br />ARAI: Yes. <br />DOMINGO: You know, can I make a comment? <br />WATANABE: Sure. <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />17 <br /> <br />