Laserfiche WebLink
WATANABE: Yeah, okay. We have the general concept of that. Thank you, Mr. <br />Branco. Okay, who would like to go next? You, Ma’am? <br />BRANCO-AZEVEDO: I’ll go. Hi. Good morning. My name is Marvellee Branco-Azevedo. <br />My address is 184 Awa Street. I’m next to the proposed application. I’m opposed for two <br />reasons. Basically, I’m concerned about Urban sprawl. Second, I’d like to protect Ag lands. I <br />understand that there are conditions that have been added; and that’s great. However, I still see <br />there may be some type of neighborly concerns. I mean I understand there’s a condition but it <br />doesn’t prevent a neighbor from calling to complain, you know; and that’s something we need to <br />deal with should that happen. <br />As far as Urban sprawl I noticed you had explained on the north end and west ends. In the <br />General Plan there’s Urban development, and that’s great. Eventually when the time comes <br />we’ll have to have more Urban lands. But for the time being I think if we can control and keep <br />growth to a very minimum at this time, I think that’s best for our community and our island. <br />Where the more we develop all these Ag lands into Urban and we live amongst towns, we’re <br />going to lose our general idea of the aloha land. We’re going to be living in cities. We already <br />have that happening in the Puna area where infrastructure is very low. How is that going to <br />affect our lifestyles where we are? There are traffic concerns, there are police concerns. I mean <br />right now Nani Mau has got some type of an amendment. They’re operating a school. It has <br />impacted our community tremendously. We’ve got students roaming the area, you know, we’ve <br />got traffic impacted by the students being dropped off and picked up and buses; and it’s just not <br />the serene community that we’ve come to know or we’ve enjoyed all these many years. And I <br />really feel that if we keep it Ag there are many other areas that we can have growth. <br />And as far as selling this for development purposes or having our real property be affected <br />should these lands be divided up into half acre lots, I’m against that. Basically our land has been <br />owned by our family for over 50 years. There’s no intent for it to be sold. Our children know <br />that. It’s just a family commitment that Panaewa is our homeland, and all the grandchildren <br />know that. I’ve submitted a letter from the grandchildren; and we’d just like to preserve our area <br />as long as we can. <br />WATANABE: Thank you. Do we have any questions for Ms. Azevedo? Seeing <br />none, okay. Thank you. Yes, Mr. Domingo. <br />DOMINGO: What do you think about one acre lots? <br />BRANCO-AZEVEDO: I would be satisfied with one acre. I’m definitely against half acre <br />lots. One acre is all right, but the ultimate idea is three acres is what we would want. One acre if <br />they have to develop and chop it up into an acre, you still can farm, you still preserve some area. <br />But at this point in time I think three acres is most feasible. <br />WATANABE: Any further -? Yes, Mr. Iwashita. <br />IWASHITA: One acre is like Sunrise Ridge. <br />BRANCO-AZEVEDO: Correct. <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />8 <br /> <br />