My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-12-06 tmartinage-nunn
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-12-06 tmartinage-nunn
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:11:38 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:11:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TORIGOE: Just the two, okay. All right. So, how about exhibits? Again, Mr. <br />Farwell, are there any exhibits that you would like enter into evidence? At this point we have, I <br />think, your Petition for Standing and your Statement. Would you like to have those entered into <br />evidence? <br />FARWELL: Certainly. <br />TORIGOE: Okay. Are there any other exhibits that you want to put in? <br />FARWELL: Uh, no. <br />TORIGOE: No other pictures or documents? <br />FARWELL: No. The map basically spells it out. <br />TORIGOE: Okay, okay. So you’d like to have the map that the staff put up on the <br />board also in evidence? <br />FARWELL: Certainly. <br />TORIGOE: Okay. And Mr. Martinage and Mr. Conventz, would you object to those <br />exhibits being in evidence? <br />CONVENTZ: No. Application and contents. <br />TORIGOE: Okay. All right, any other exhibits that you would be trying to put into <br />evidence? <br />CONVENTZ: None. <br />TORIGOE: Okay. Mr. Farwell, is there any other kind of evidence that you would <br />want to put in besides what we’ve talked about? <br />FARWELL: No. <br />TORIGOE: Okay. Mr. Conventz, is there any other evidence that you would like to <br />put in? <br />CONVENTZ: No. <br />TORIGOE: Okay. And finally, you’d probably be given opportunity to make oral <br />arguments, possibly at the beginning and at the end. Normally the applicant that is Mr. Conventz <br />and Mr. Martinage would present first, and then the intervenor, and then the applicant would <br />have a final word on that. Would that be agreeable to you? <br />FARWELL: Yes. <br />TORIGOE: Okay. And Mr. Conventz? <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />17 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.