Laserfiche WebLink
And if not, then I think it’s only fair to everybody involved that we do have a continuance, so <br />that we’d have the opportunity to all start on the same level, having read everything, and start <br />from there before we, you know, take it up to next step that Mr. Lim was suggesting. Can I see <br />who read everything, I mean, everything? Everything? <br />ALAMEDA: Mr. McCall? And then Commissioner Iwashita. <br />MCCALL: Just, I mean, I don’t think it’s appropriate to ask us that, to tell you the <br />truth, but I made good stab at trying to go through everything. But anyway, I think that what we <br />have in front of us is a request from the applicant for continuance. I think we should debate the <br />merits of going on continuance and on its merits. I’m in favor of continuance if that’s what the <br />applicant wants. <br />ALAMEDA: All right. Mr. Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA: I guess, when the Chair is ready, I would move to continue this matter <br />based on the applicant’s request and with the expressed understanding that the Commission <br />retains its powers, authority and discretion under 4-33 in terms of the extent of how the <br />remainder of the matter is going to be considered. <br />ALAMEDA: I like that. I’d like to entertain that motion, if there is no objection to <br />that. <br />SIRACUSA: I’ll second it. <br />ALAMEDA: Commissioner Iwashita, could you formalize the motion? <br />IWASHITA: I just did. <br />ALAMEDA: You just did, okay. Motion made by Commissioner Iwashita to <br />continue the hearing as requested by the applicant, seconded by Commissioner Siracusa. <br />Discussion? We got a date on that or, staff, what will be a potential date to continue this? <br />HAYASHI: I think perhaps it’ll be more appropriate to ask the applicant, since the <br />applicant is asking for the continuance, as to when they would like to be back on the agenda. <br />ALAMEDA: Thank you, thank you, Mr. Hayashi. <br />LIM: We could do that in January or early February. <br />ALAMEDA: Okay. So, January or early February. Do we need a specific date for <br />the record? Mr. Hardy-Sullivan? <br />HARDY-SULLIVAN: May we request it will be no earlier than a February date because the <br />th <br />hearing with the civil court is on January 25, 2007? I think Mr. Hayashi said that the January <br />th <br />meeting is January 19. <br />HAYASHI: That’s correct. <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />19 <br /> <br />