2005-12-08 TAmendment to PC Rules

Home

3.Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, the sign shall be not less than nine square feet and not more than twelve square feet in area, with letters not less than one inch high. No pictures, drawings, or promotional materials shall be permitted on the sign. The sign shall be posted at or near the property boundary adjacent to a public road bordering the property and shall be visible from said public road. If more than one public road borders the property, the applicant shall post the sign to be readable from the more heavily traveled public road. The sign shall, in all other respects, be in compliance with Chapter 3 (signs) Hawaii County Code 1983 (2005 edition). 4.The applicant shall file an affidavit with the planning department not more than five days after posting the sign stating that a sign has been posted in compliance with this rule, and that the applicant and its agents will not remove the sign until the application has been granted, denied, or withdrawn. A photograph of the sign in place shall accompany the affidavit. ALAMEDA:The Hawaii County Planning Commission is now back in order. Right nowourthirdagendaitemfortoday,thelastagendaitem.Thisisinregardstotheamendments to appropriate sections of the Planning Commission Rule 6, Rule 7, Rule 8, Rule 9, Rule 11, Rule 12, Rule 13, Rule 15, and Rule 16. The amendments to be included and well just turn it over to staff. Staff? HAYASHI:Thank you Mr., testing, testing are we on? Thank you. Basically these rule changes are a result of the amendments that were adopted for changes to the zoning and subdivision code relative to posting of signs for notification. As you recall we all had hearings on these changes to the code and at that time the Planning Commission also indicated that we would amend the appropriate section of the various rules. So, these are the changes that are being proposed. All of you have copies of the proposed changes. I do have one change however and thats a typo and thats if you look at one of the rules proposed rules it says, item number C if you take a look at the first one which is rule number 6 second page item C. Are we all on the same page? And it says, notwithstanding any provisions of the law the sign shall not be less that, and that should be than, so all of the changes will be made accordingly. And these are typos and I was the one that typed it so I apologize for that. Other than that theres nothing more to add on this I think its-. And just to let you know for some of the rezoning applications that recently came in, the applicants did post signs. So, some of these at one point in time if you may see this, drive around you may be seeing these signs. Are there any questions? ALAMEDA:Yes Commissioner Siracusa question? SIRACUSA:Yes, could you remind me Norman is there any kind of provision in the event that the sign is either removed or tampered with by person or persons unknown. Is there any provision for whose responsibility it is to replace it if there is such a responsibility anywhere? HAYASHI:Theres nothing in the provisions, neither in the code or the proposed rules regarding that matter. Theres nothing stated in the existing code, subdivision or zoning code as EXHIBIT C 2