My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-12-08 TAmendment to PC Rules
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-12-08 TAmendment to PC Rules
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:14:56 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:14:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ALAMEDA:Okay. Thank you. Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:You know, actually I think that came up in discussion in the Council <br />meeting when the ordinance was approved and what not. And I, as I recall one of the comments <br />that was made by the contractor was that he saw very minimal risk of that occurring and-. You <br />know in the example that you gave. I mean if I were against a project Id be pointing to it, I <br />wouldnt get rid of the sign because Im trying to draw attention to it. Do you follow what Im <br />saying, the logic behind that? So I, its more maybe vandalism that youd be concerned with like <br />young kids or something. But hopefully that the risk is minimal. <br />ALAMEDA:How about on this side? Commissioner Graham, Commissioner McCall <br />any thoughts? Commissioner McCall? <br />MCCALL:Yeah, just I think I remember the same discussions I mean there was <br />discussion about you know what you could do and the idea that you didnt want to burden the <br />landownerwithhavingtoputthesignupeverydayifsomebodydecidestotearitdown.AndI <br />recall the thought, its the same thing as that you have to post it in the public paper and the <br />population is supposed to see it in the paper. If they dont see it in the paper its not the <br />applicants fault and like hes gotta go put it in the paper you know more times. <br />ALAMEDA:Yeah. <br />MCCALL:I mean hes done his job and thats about, you know thats all they could <br />ask. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Norman I have a question. So you know when they post the sign is <br />it, does it get documented somewhere? <br />HAYASHI:Yes, theyre required to file an affidavit stating that they had posted a sign. <br />They also would be required to submit photos of the-, <br />ALAMEDA:Oh yeah? <br />HAYASHI:-posting, the sign being in place. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay so that at least it shows the initial you know sign posting and kind of <br />like thats due diligence already right there as far as Im concerned. Any Commissioners any <br />other thoughts? More thoughts on that? Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:Well I think that lets let it go for now. If down the line it looks like there <br />are you know, were getting a lot of those signs vandalized then we can I guess always look at <br />making some changes on how were going to address that. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. <br />EXHIBIT C <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.