Laserfiche WebLink
ALAMEDA:Thank you Commissioner Graham for the clarification. Other <br />Commissioners? Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:Yes I have another question. We know that you€re going to reduce the <br />seating from 2 layers to 1. So how far out from the, from the existing lanai I should say, the <br />existing porch or whatever it is where that railing is will your lanai come out? It€ll obviously go <br />past the coconut palms in order to include them. <br />LIM:It€s going to be approximately 12 feet 6 inches from the floor, I mean from <br />the face of the building out. <br />SIRACUSA:And then how much will that leave between the end of the lanai and the <br />sea wall on the inner side of the sea wall? <br />LIM:That would leave approximately 31 feet 10 inches. The current open <br />spacethereisabout43feet10inches.Soitwouldbeabout12feetwideandthereforethe <br />remaining open space would be 31 feet 10 inches, approximately. <br />SIRACUSA:And the sea wall marks the existing shoreline? <br />LIM:That€s correct. The face of the sea wall. <br />SIRACUSA:Okay. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you Commissioner Siracusa. Other questions for our applicant <br />before we open it up to public testimony? Very well, thank you, you may be seated. Has there <br />anyone been anyone signed up for public testimony? Staff? Is there any testimony on this <br />particular application? No, none? <br />DARROW:Not for this application. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay, we making you guys do aerobics. Can you please come back up <br />again to the front? Director? <br />YUEN:Yeah, I just wanted to make a few comments. I think the discussion here <br />has been very good in clarifying everything that happened. There€s also a diagram that some of <br />you have out in front of you that in combination with the photos I think makes it very clear. This <br />is the second time this has been before the Commission and there were some discussion last time <br />by the Commissioners about this. And, I€d like to address some of the issues that were raised by <br />the Commission members. Particularly, there€s a question about the Department€s <br />recommendation, favorable recommendation where we have been taking a strict stand and did <br />recommend denial of another shoreline setback variance in Kona Bay Estates. This, and we <br />originally recommended denial of an application that was a little bit different here. It had a <br />bigger intrusion into the shoreline setback and it did not have this ADA ramp feature which <br />improves public access. Our, if you, if you want to discuss the difference between this and the <br />EXHIBIT A <br />11 <br /> <br />