Laserfiche WebLink
And then also, I was given this notice, like she said, only two days ago. And when we got this, <br />we all responded. I have many residents that I’ve talked to, and they had no idea even that this <br />kind of impact was going on in front of them. <br />I want to reiterate again that this was done 20 years ago. And with the volume of subdivisions <br />that are around it, there is obviously a whole different point of view coming across already. <br />I think I might have to just stop for a bit here -. <br />GRAHAM: That’s fine. <br />P. FEDIUK: Because I’ve kind of reached a breaking point of what I was going to say. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you for your testimony. And we have one further testimony from <br />Alysse. <br />CATRON: My name is Alysse Catron, 76-833 Io Kualua Way. And I agree with <br />what my neighbors here have to say. And again, this zoning was granted in 1984 when Kona <br />looked a lot different. Kona Vistas has built out its single-family portion of this subdivision, and <br />now what’s left is all multi-family. And we are a bit concerned with this density with the <br />problems that Kona has with the infrastructure already. None of us knew until today that Kona <br />Vistas was trying to sell this property. But it is really irrelevant whether it’s Kona Vistas or the <br />next developer or that. Our biggest concern is handling the flood water, providing water and <br />infrastructure that can sustain this high-density construction. Thank you. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you -. <br />P. FEDIUK: If I could just -. <br />GRAHAM: Penny, we are short on time -. <br />P. FEDIUK: I just -. <br />GRAHAM: Also for a break. You’ve got something further? Go ahead -. <br />P. FEDIUK: Yeah, if I just could add one thing, too. This sign that is down on the <br />Highway there, it is put, that draws our attention; because it wasn’t just the letter that I got as a <br />300-foot homeowner, but there is a sign there also on Queen K. And it’s very hard to see in the <br />first place, but also when you get there, it’s labelized this, “Multi-Family and/or Single-Family <br />Residential.” And I guess we are questioning if there is an amendment here. Hey, we are all for <br />single-family dwelling, but we are not for multi-family. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you. Noriko, how are we with our lunch schedule? Do we need to <br />zoom right over, that they are waiting for us, or -? We’d best break and -. <br />SAUER: Five more minutes or -? <br />GRAHAM: Pardon? <br />EXHIBIT B <br />8 <br /> <br />