My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-12-12 TKOHALA LLC
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-12-12 TKOHALA LLC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:20:10 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:20:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GRAHAM: Then we’ll hear your testimony. And when you start, just give your name <br />and address, so it’s on the record for us. <br />BYRNE: Sure. <br />GRAHAM: Thanks. <br />BYRNE: And I’ll keep it brief ’cause it looks like it’s going to be deferred to <br />January. So we’ll come back in January; and there will be other representatives here from the <br />organizations I’m, that also signed this testimony. My name is Gail Byrne, and I’m representing <br />Malama Kohala Kahakai as well as five other non-profit organizations in Kohala. And we <br />testified and submitted testimony at the August Planning Commission and supported the <br />Planning Director’s actions to repeal Ordinance 97-102 and to revoke the Special Management <br />Area Permit 379. We also asked at that time, and we continue to ask, for a change of zone to at <br />least Ag 20a; and there is really strong basis for that. In brief, there is over 30 years of State and <br />County resolutions, Community Development Plans, and community petitions have called for <br />this coast to be zoned Open and Conservation.Coastal zoning of Ag-5a has never been aligned <br />with what the community has wanted for this shoreline and it’s very well documented history. I <br />think I provided that in August, over 30 years of work regarding that. RA-20 is more aligned <br />with the long-standing ,documented work of the community. <br />You know, most significantly, as I understand it, this applicant doesn’t meet the conditions for a <br />time extension. The conditions and contexts under which this application was initially approved <br />have changed. This project is not consistent with the present and past General Plans, it is not <br />consistent with input received from the community during the recent readiness process for the <br />North Kohala Community Development Planning process that’s undergoing, and it is not <br />consistent with draft recommendations that are coming out of the focus groups up there, which <br />are calling for a rezoning of the State coastal lands to Conservation, finally getting to what the <br />community has asked for over 30 years. So they list some other reasons why RA-20 is valid <br />here; I won’t go into this again. We’ll be back in January. I just want to thank you for your time <br />this morning. <br />GRAHAM: Thanks, Ms. Byrne. Do we have any questions for the testifier from the <br />Commissioners? <br />SIRACUSA: Yes. <br />GRAHAM: Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA: You mentioned that you were representing, I believe, five different <br />groups. Could you tell us what those groups are? <br />BYRNE: Sure. They are listed on the back of the, I don’t know if you’ve got a <br />copy; I brought in copies this morning for everyone. The organizations, I’m with Malama <br />Kohala Kahakai; there’s Maikai‘i Kamakani ‘O Kohala, Kamakani ‘O Kohala Ohana, the Kohala <br />Historic and Cultural Preservation Group, Malama Na Wahi Pana O Kohala and Hui Lihikai. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.