Laserfiche WebLink
issues been addressed? Do we know that this is adequate and safe and fine, the entry and exit to <br />this property? I just haven’t seen anything about that. <br />DARROW: It hasn’t come up at this point, but it’s something that we can address. <br />Maybe the applicants might be able to more fully answer that. Looking at the Public Works’ <br />memorandum, it just mentions their standard conditions. <br />GRAHAM: Yes. That’s what I saw also. Thank you. Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE: I believe I recall the application you are discussing, and I believe that was <br />kind of like a nonconforming flag lot. And the driveway was directly adjacent to an already <br />existing building, and that’s why sight-distance became a concern there. But this I believe is <br />pretty open in the front. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you. Any other questions from the Commissioners for <br />Mr. Darrow? All right. Could the applicant and/or applicant’s representative please come <br />forward at this time? Could you raise your right hands, please? And I’ll swear you in now. Do <br />you swear or affirm to tell the truth on this matter before the Planning Commission today? <br />YEH: I do. <br />KILGORE: I do. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you both. And Mr. Yeh, if you want to begin -. <br />YEH: Sure. <br />GRAHAM: And just start with your name and address, please. <br />YEH: Thank you. My name is Thomas Yeh, representative for the applicant. <br />My address is 85 West Lanikaula Street, Hilo, Hawaii. <br />KILGORE: And my name is Matthew Kilgore with Koa Architects up in Waimea. My <br />address is 65-1285 C Kawaihae Road, 96743. <br />YEH: Thank you, Mr. Chairman and Members of the Commission. On the <br />security gate issue, to answer Commissioner Watanabe’s question, that’s not a problem. If the <br />Commission feels it’s necessary to insert as a direct prohibition, that’s fine. One of the reasons <br />for that, too, is there have been some discussions with some representatives of the community <br />where they didn’t want to have a gate, just so that people who wanted to exercise traditional <br />access, if any, to get to the shoreline, they could do that without having to climb over a gate. <br />There are, as we mentioned in the last hearing, accesses within, public accesses within 100 yards <br />of each side of the property. <br />And then in terms of the sight-distance issue, yeah, I don’t believe there is really an issue; and <br />Mr. Kilgore can talk about that. <br />EXHIBIT E <br />3 <br /> <br />