2007-12-12 TKILGORE - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

pass those photographs, you’ll see the approximate location of where the former seawall was. And that’s essentially the rubble that you see in the photographs we showed you. And then if you take a look at the next Exhibit H-2, it has where the 2005 shoreline was with the 40- and then 20-foot setbacks noted thereon. And then finally when you get to the next Exhibit H – I think there is an H, yes – H-3, it shows the current certified shoreline; and then you also get an idea where these other buildings, current buildings are both to the north and south, and there was as you can see here also makai where the actual allowable footprint is now for this project. So it kind of gives you an idea of what the progression has been both from the seaward boundary 2005 to the current. We know that from an interpretation standpoint, you know, a 2-year period shouldn’t result in that kind of a change, but from an interpretation standpoint, unfortunately it has; and so therefore, they’ve lost this one unit that they were going to build. GRAHAM: Thank you, Mr. Yeh. YEH: Thank you -. GRAHAM: Any other questions from the Commissioners? ALAMEDA: Actually -. GRAHAM: Commissioner Alameda? ALAMEDA: No, I was going to say you already answered my question. But I’ll trade my four pens for your one pen. No, I’m just kidding. I like the pointer.I think that’s something that we should consider in the future. It’s easy. YUEN: Make a note that when Commissioner Alameda retires from the Planning Commission, that will be his present -. ALAMEDA: Yes. YUEN: So a laser pointer pen. ALAMEDA: A laser pointer. Never give a kolohe boy a laser pointer. No. Actually, I’m ready to entertain a motion, if that’s okay with the Commission. GRAHAM: Hang on a second, please. First, I don’t have anybody signed up for public testimony. But is there anyone here that would like to give public testimony? YEH: Mr. Chairman, just one more area ‘cause there -. GRAHAM: Yes, Mr. Yeh. YEH: You know, there was just one of the areas concerning parking, and I know I covered it somewhat. And if you’ve taken a look at the Plan Approvals, we really do believe that the parking that’s been proposed is sufficient. In response to the issue that was raised the last time, what Mr. Kilgore did is he actually moved an exit stair along the north side more towards the shoreline and created some additional space to try to squeeze one parking stall there. EXHIBIT E 8