My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-12-17 TNani MauO
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-12-17 TNani MauO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:24:42 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:24:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
contemplated and would have been possible traffic generators have been already dropped from <br />the permit. The level of activity now is nearly far below what would trigger the need to upgrade, <br />for this operator, to upgrade the intersection. The timing of the uses, it does, it tends not to <br />conflict with the major traffic along the highway. That side of the highway, you, the primary, <br />most of the traffic on that side is heading into Hilo in the morning, the busier side is going out in <br />the afternoon. Their large functions tend to be in the evening, after all the traffic, in fact, after <br />the major traffic in the area, and in a different, and not interfering with the major flow of traffic. <br />So we felt reasonably comfortable with eliminating this condition. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. <br />FUJIKAWA:Is there any other question, Commissioners, with the Applicant, or the <br />staff, or the Director? <br />HAYASHI:Mr.Chair? <br />FUJIKAWA:Goahead. <br />HAYASHI:IlljustmakeoneclarificationregardingtheresponseIgaveto,Ibelieve <br />was Commissioner Grahams question regarding the salon; and my response was that it was <br />established sometime in the late 1990s. The salon and beauty shop, hair salon was established <br />within the main building, which also included the restaurant back in the late 90s. Just recently, I <br />believe, back in 2001, the salon and spa was moved to the building that is situated adjacent to the <br />main restaurant building. So I just wanted to clarify that. <br />Were proposing that Condition 4, only the words, and equestrian trails, agricultural museum, <br />be deleted. <br />And as far as Condition 5, were proposing that the two proposed snack shopsthe proposed <br />fruit/vegetable stand and the agricultural museum, and at the very end it says that the <br />equestrian stable and trails, those should be deleted. And the reason why, again, is that those <br />activities were proposed in this particular area shaded in yellow which has since been deleted <br />from the Special Permit. <br />SIRACUSA:Question? <br />FUJIKAWA:Siracusa. <br />SIRACUSA:Norman, what about the coin-operated dispensing machines and mobile <br />vendors, have those been deleted as well? <br />HAYASHI:No, those are left in; and the reason why is I believe those coin-operated <br />vending machines are situated or will be situated in front of the restaurant, or as part of the <br />restaurant complex. <br />SIRACUSA:Okay, cause I noticed you hadnt mentioned them. I was just wondering <br />if it was an oversight or if there was a reason for it. Thank you. <br />12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.