My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-12-17 TNani MauO
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-12-17 TNani MauO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 4:24:42 PM
Creation date
6/14/2011 4:24:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
go together, or vice, or the other thing is, I mean, if were looking, if these are still on the books <br />when we make -. I mean, my question is, you know, if these are still on the books when we <br />make the recommendation to remove the highway improvements, are we, you know, are we <br />doing this prematurely or should these all be done at one time? <br />HAYASHI:What well be recommending to the Land Use Commission, if the <br />Commission accepts the Planning Directors recommendation, is to also include the <br />housekeeping changes of deleting the agricultural museum, the equestrian trail, the fruit stand <br />and couple of the other retail outlets that or uses that initially was proposed and subsequently <br />deleted, since that particular area was deleted from the Special Permit back in 1994. So, <br />technically, while the condition refers to those uses, those uses are not, were in the area that was <br />already deleted. So we should have done, made the necessary changes to those conditions when <br />the deletion occurred for this area back in 1994. So its basically a housekeeping change that <br />well be recommending to the Land Use Commission. <br />FUJIKAWA:Is there any other question, Commissioners, to the staff? If not, the <br />Applicantsrepresentative,youhavebeenswornin.Giveyournamesoyoumayproceed. <br />HSU:MynameisChianHsu.ImthemanagerofNaniMau,Inc.Andnow, <br />Norman basically talked about the whole story, but then Ill just kind of make, clarify some <br />things. So Nani Mau is still requesting deletion of Condition No. 7 from Docket No. Special <br />Permit 73-159. And Condition No. 7 was originally numbered as Condition No. 8 in the fourth <br />amendment, and the condition now of highway intersection improvement, that was originally <br />imposed upon the approved, the expansion plans. And since then Condition No. 7 has been <br />restated in the following four amendments. <br />Ill talk a little bit about the fourth amendment: Approved the arboretum to be expanded by an <br />additional five acres for storage and the establishment of forest trails for a total area of <br />approximately 58.793 acres. And, also, approved expansion of retail commercial activities from <br />the existing 10,562 square feet up to 25,000 square feet. The 25,000 square feet activities <br />include the main building, outdoor dining area, two proposed snack shops, proposed <br />fruit/vegetable stand and an agricultural museum. <br />The amendment increased the total area of Nani Mau Gardens project site to approximately <br />58.786 acres. Therefore, Condition No. 7 was imposed. I guess the No. 7 was imposed because <br />of the anticipated traffic impact resulting from this expansion plan. So Condition No. 7 stated <br />that the Hawaii Belt Highway shall be improved with a right- turn deceleration lane from the <br />Hawaii Belt Highway onto Makalika Street; and an acceleration lane for traffic entering <br />Makalika Street; and also additional street lighting; and the highway improvement should be <br />constructed within five years from the date of this amendment or when traffic volumes of the <br />Hawaii Belt Highway-Makalika Street intersection reach levels warranting such improvements <br />as determined by the State Department of Transportation or Department of Public Works. <br />And after the fourth amendment, the sixth amendment deleted the five-acre garden expansion <br />area which was approved by the fourth amendment. <br />And the following seventh amendment deleted approximately 30 acres from the Special Permit. <br />This amendment deleted the area of the proposed 9-hole pitch and putt golf course. <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.