Laserfiche WebLink
taken out. Technically, its not on the permit, but its still on the original form. So thats all we <br />have do, is take it out of the original form. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Chair? <br />FUJIKAWA:Go ahead, Springer. <br />SPRINGER:Would you have any objections to us doing that today then? <br />FUJIYAMA:If it can be done, its fine. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. <br />FUJIKAWA:Commissioner Siracusa. <br />SIRACUSA:Would we have to do a separate motion first to delete the references in <br />Conditions4and5toequestriantrailsandtwosnackshops,andthatsortofthing,andgetthat <br />cleared up first before we make a motion on the general deletion of <br />Condition No. 7? Im wondering if Corp. Counsel would care to comment on the proper or the <br />most expedient way of doing this? <br />TORIGOE:Well, in terms, you know, on the status of those other uses, youre saying <br />that they were already deleted in some fashion or -? <br />HAYASHI:Those uses were proposed in the area in the back, which is al -. This <br />particular area has already been deleted from the permit. So the Special Permit only is for, <br />includes this blue-shaded areas. The uses that the Land Use Commission had requested that <br />they be deleted in Conditions 4 and 5 were in these areas here. So, technically, this portion is <br />already out. So when the permit was amended back in 1994 to delete this portion here, the <br />Conditions 4 and 5 should also have been amended to take out those uses that were proposed. <br />TORIGOE:So youre saying this isnt a really substantive change at this point, its just <br />a formality to change and approving the paperwork -? <br />HAYASHI:Yes, I would think so. Thats correct. <br />TORIGOE:If that is the case, then, I think you can explore the motion, and include the <br />proposed amendments as stated by staff at this point. <br />FUJIKAWA:Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:Ms. Hsu, you spoke of -. <br />FUJIYAMA:I would have a question with staff. On Condition 4, there was one area <br />that we didnt want to totally delete Condition 4, because it had in there a section that says -. <br />One second, I have to find it on here. Yeah, if we can, we would have no objection to delete the <br />secondary uses. Okay, thats fine. <br />7 <br /> <br />