2004-12-17 TNani MauO - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

GRAHAM:No, I dont have it either. But I would like to discuss with you, you know, based on what we have on this one on pages 3 and 4. Okay, on pages 3 and 4 of the County Background Report, starting at -. SIRACUSA:The chronology? GRAHAM:Yes, its called the Chronology, July 24, 1991. FUJIYAMA:Is that Item No. 7? GRAHAM:Yes, Item 7 there. Okay, so what Im trying to do is look at the three factors that you put forth here and just try to evaluate the justification of the factors for removing that condition. And since I dont have the 1991 documentation complete on what was decided at thattime,ImsortofgoingbywhattheygavemehereinthisChronology,sothethingswhich were added at that time which presumably are the reasons for the traffic requirement. The first thing it says, a 5-acre expansionfor stockpiling, storage and establishing forest trails on an adjoining parcel. So is that 5-acre expansion -? HSU:Deleted -. GRAHAM:Being removed? FUJIYAMA:We dont have it -. HSU:That was removed -. NOMURA:Please use the microphone. HSU:The amendment. FUJIYAMA:It was a proposed leased parcel from an adjoining owner; and we dont have that lease, so it was never consummated. The lease was never consummated. GRAHAM:Okay. And then the second one it says, amend hours of operation for secondary uses (restaurant and commercial uses) from 8 a.m. to 11 p.m. So that amendment stays, youre not deleting that amendment, correct? FUJIYAMA:That stays because thats primarily our restaurant use. GRAHAM:Okay. And then the third one here says, expansion of retail activitiesin an area no greater than 25,000 square feet. And, so, that expansion also stays? FUJIYAMA:Yes, we want to keep that. GRAHAM:Okay. And then the fourth one say, additional access from Makalika Street for special events parking. Does that also stay? We still have that additional access? 9