Laserfiche WebLink
the regional road network to mitigate the problem, or you wait until improvements have <br />been made that take away the Level of Service deficiency. <br />SIRACUSA:I -? <br />YUEN:Yes? Why don€t we take questions. We can take questions as I go <br />along. You have a question? <br />SIRACUSA:Okay. It€s my impression that when you€re talking about roads <br />here you€re only talking about major arterials, County and State Highways, and not <br />smaller roads which may be County-owned but would go into say cul-de-sac <br />subdivisions. Is that a correct assessment? <br />YUEN:No. As far as the regional roads, yes. It would only be the arterial <br />roads,themainhighways.Itsaysarterialandcollectorroads.Butyouwouldstill,ifyou <br />had a project on a small street that could generate 100 or more trips per day (sic), this <br />would say you should do a traffic study; and if that would congest that road, then you <br />would do the local mitigation for that. But you wouldn€t have somebody go fix, well, <br />you can make them fix the road that they€re on as part of the local mitigation. <br />SIRACUSA:I€m thinking in terms of roads, obviously I€m thinking of roads <br />where I live, single lane dirt road; and 100 trips per a day is ridiculous. I mean when five <br />new subdivisions were approved, you know, 20 cars made a humongous difference. And <br />so it seems that you€re not taking scale into consideration here, that in some areas 100 <br />trips may be a perfectly reasonable way of gauging this. But in other areas, 50 or even 20 <br />trips would be a tremendous impact. And there doesn€t seem to be a lot of flexibility. <br />And when I was reading through here, and you talked about things being vague. To me, <br />it was that they were allowing for some flexibility because some of these situations are so <br />different from one community and one area to another. And how do we walk that thin <br />line of balancing, you know, being really specific and on allowing enough variation to <br />allow for different regions and their own specific layouts and problems? <br />YUEN:None of these bills is intended to answer all of the issues that may <br />come up during a rezoning request. So, for example, in a situation you gave where if <br />somebody is applying for a rezoning on say a one-lane road that is just not suitable for <br />that level of development, then regardless of whether you have a concurrency ordinance <br />or not, the right response is to deny the rezoning because the road is not adequate to serve <br />the proposed project. The reason to have a cutoff for doing the traffic report is that the <br />traffic report studies congestion. The TIAR may refer to the type of road that€s in front <br />of the project, but the TIAR only tells you about congestion. The TIAR doesn€t tell you, <br />you know, there€s a 40-foot drop off the shoulder. Okay? So it doesn€t solve those kinds <br />of issues. And those things are still out there; and you have to use common sense and <br />judgment in analyzing any rezoning. This only deals with the question of traffic <br />congestion and how it may affect the local and the regional road networks. <br />4EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />