GMAC 3.21.23 Minutes final draft

Home

NR: DOBOR. And then we also submitted – Natalie, District - 7 – we… AA: Hold on Natalie. Question from \[unclear\] my concern was a specific permits and a fixed monthly fee of $300 in addition to commercial use permit fees. The committee comment was on this is if the permits are reduced to 48 employees – 48 employees will be relieved – local businesses shut down in financial hardship for local families. Where does the $300 plus additional fees go – so that’s what I’m asking. NR: Yeah, so, we reached out by email, by phone, and we did not get any response back. AA: So, can we have a motion to accept Natalie’s committee’s manta ray approval of her draft rules or? SW: So, you mean are you approving of this report? AA: Just the report. SW: Yeah, but she doesn’t have draft rules. AA: I’m sorry. ACTION: A motion was made by R. Duerr for GMAC to approve the manta ray viewing overview report. Seconded by N. Reynolds. Motion carried unanimously by poll voice vote with 6 ayes and no nays. RD: I’ll make a motion that we approve the manta ray viewing overview report. NR: I second that… AA: Robert Duerr made a motion to approve the report, Natalie second. Open for comments and questions from the Commission. Go ahead Leomana. Oh zero…. Are we going to send this report to somewhere? AG: I get one question, Abraham. Austin Griffey, District – 6. What do we do if we get no contact back from these guys relating the matter? NR: Yeah, cause it’s challenging when we reach out November, December, January, February, March – nothing. AA: Ah, Abraham, District – 5. The only thing we can do is keep trying – if they no respond to you then that’s their priority to respond. RD: Well, one thing we could do is we could say – we could 1) recognize some of the questions that were asked that \[unclear\] we didn’t have answers – maybe the reason why they weren’t answered – and we could ask from this Commission that this was brought forward that, you 35