My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
GMAC 4.18.23 Minutes Final Draft
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Archives
>
2023 GMAC Meeting Packets
>
2023_05_16 GMAC Meeting Packet
>
GMAC 4.18.23 Minutes Final Draft
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2023 3:43:11 PM
Creation date
1/18/2024 1:08:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SW: I’m I do think that we – GMAC can have a discussion as far as what you want to have included. I <br />can also include as the Board’s attorney, the Board’s perspective as far as your rules, <br />responsibilities, liabilities, powers related to the report, which would be better served within an <br />Executive Session, and then you guys can make decisions outside of Executive Session, but, <br />however, we’re not presently set-up to allow for an Executive Session, I just inquired with Barret <br />prior to this but that might be better served because I do greatly appreciate the bullet points <br />that you provided – it’s very thorough – however, there’s more discussion, I think, that should <br />be had in Executive Session. <br /> <br />LT: Yup. <br /> <br />AA: Abraham, District – 5, so at this time, can we schedule… <br /> <br />SW: We can… <br /> <br />AA: No. My idea is can we schedule to have a separate training outside of the meeting via Zoom or <br />something where or maybe you can have a meeting – have a training with, you know, the west <br />side and another training with the east side on that particular topic because I know Natalie has <br />question similar to what’s coming up right now. <br /> <br />SW: OK. So… <br /> <br />RD: I seem to be lost in the discussion… Aren’t we – don’t we have Leomana’s – Duerr, District – 1, <br />don’t we have Leomana’s report in front of us and are we looking to then have a motion to <br />accept this? <br /> <br />SW: Not yet. <br /> <br />AA: Not yet. <br /> <br />RD: What…why <br /> <br />AA: There’s not, there’s not enough – per Corporation Counsel and even per Leomana and even <br />Natalie came up with her – brought up a question – it’s like it needs more bite in these reports <br />basically, yeah? It’s good but I guess we need more reasoning or of like what we’ve done. This is <br />just like the pinpoints through that – you can get – that anybody can get just reading our <br />agendas. So, we need little bit more and if we can come up with a guideline through it for to <br />help everyone out in the future then it’s kinda – that’s why I’m kinda asking for some kind of <br />training on the, you know, outside but it has to be in a meeting with an executive order… <br /> <br />RD: Duerr, District – 1. What I do like about this is it’s one page. You know, it’s one page. Leomana? <br />How many hours did it take you to do this? <br /> <br />SW: Um… <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.