My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023_09_19 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2023
>
2023_09_19 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2023 2:04:51 PM
Creation date
1/18/2024 1:53:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SW: OK. So, we have a motion posed by Chair Abraham, we need a second. <br /> <br />NR: Natalie, District – 7. I second the motion to divide the district up. <br /> <br />Action: A motion was made by A. Antonio to separate the Commissioners into <br />two separate PIGs. One dealing with East side, and one dealing with the West <br />side of the Island. Commissioners will be divided equally, four on each side. <br />The motion was seconded by N. Reynolds. Motion passed unanimously by voice <br />pole votes with 6 ayes, 2 excused. <br /> <br />LT: OK. We have a motion by Chair Abraham to separate the Commission into two separate <br />PIGs. One dealing with the East and one dealing with the West side of the Island. Ah, set <br />four and four so that way we have – we don’t break any Sunshine laws. Any discussion? <br /> <br />SW: So, Deputy Corporation Counsel Sylvia Wan – I’ll just note – so right now we have just <br />divided the teams, divided the chapters but what we need is the purpose. <br /> <br />AA: The purpose is to \[unclear\] advisory so we can readjust because this, this Game <br />Management book is not – it’s very old – it’s from 2017 – 2021, no, yeah, yeah. FY 2017 <br />– 2021. So technically this thing is old and I see problems with it already from the old <br />way that we can help them move along. <br /> <br />SW: OK. So, to clarify what you’re asking, is for each group review their chapters and provide <br />advice regarding comments, suggestions, and proposed changes. <br /> <br />AA: Yeah. <br /> <br />BL: Brian, District – 4. I got a question. This is supposed to be the Pittman-Robertson <br />Wildlife Reservation Fund, which is the federally program and the money is supposed to <br />be designated for the use of hunting and fishing enhancement and the fact that on that <br />one page they’re talking about a pedestrian trail which is not the purpose of this fund, <br />we’re looking at misappropriation of funds – we’re doing boundaries, which are <br />eradication <br />that is not helping wildlife and these things so money and like they said in the beginning <br />– we can’t do anything for this but on the other hand we’ve got the same DLNR giving <br />kill permits to windmills for endangered bats, birds and everything but I can’t put a <br />water up for the goats and the sheep. So, you know, we’ve got some serious issues with <br />the Pittman-Robertson funds. I’ve gone down this rabbit hole before with these people, <br />there’s a lot of money being misappropriated, lot of money I get these things, I was told <br />not to say where the money is from DAR, where these things are going. This money is <br />supposed to be going through there – we should be… <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.