Laserfiche WebLink
Ecology and Society 28(2): 32 <br />htt.ps f.l� s / r[32/ <br />2017). Establishing collaborative management arrangements in <br />the form of Indigenous agency, the ability and capacity of <br />Indigenous people to self -govern in their best self-interest (UN <br />2007) through ancestral values such as malama aina, may increase <br />Indigenous and community participation in stewardship efforts <br />of place while also fulfilling conservation and management goals <br />(Winter et al. 2021). <br />Improving means of communication to enhance collaboration <br />The need for better communication between hunters, managers, <br />and the broader community was a key recommendation that <br />emerged from this study. Recommendations include a suggestion <br />for agencies to conduct public meetings at times and places <br />convenient for community members to attend (e.g., after work <br />hours, weekends), engage hunters to assist with outreach, and <br />employ outside entities who specialize in mediation and <br />facilitation. For example, mediators in the 1990s helped to <br />organize meetings on Hawaii Island with community members <br />including hunters, environmentalists, and forestry managers that <br />facilitated recommendations to resolve long-standing conflicts in <br />feral pig management (Adler 1995). By their last meeting, <br />community members had built strong relationships that enabled <br />them to make collective agreements. Nonetheless, studies about <br />successful collaboration and co -management among community <br />members in Hawaii are still lacking, and conflicts continue to re- <br />emerge. <br />Open interpersonal communication is a critical component for <br />successful collaboration (Schuett et al. 2001), and will more likely <br />lead to co -management (Schusler et al. 2003). Specifically, small <br />working groups may help to familiarize people with one another <br />and build positive relationships (Schusler et al. 2003). Most <br />meetings between resource managers and hunters in Hawaii are <br />held at times when most community members work, and include <br />one person speaking in front of a large panel of state employees. <br />Some participants from our study suggested this type of meeting <br />deters people from speaking. Crowley et al. (2017) emphasize that <br />communication strategies in invasive species management are <br />often simplistic and one-sided. They recommended communication <br />strategies that promote dialogue between groups and address <br />concerns, for instance mentioning both the positive and negative <br />impacts of a potential invasive species management effort <br />(Crowley et al. 2017). Similarly, some participants from our study <br />wanted DLNR to also consider and recognize the potential for <br />unintended negative impacts of proposed management actions, <br />rather than solely promoting the intended benefits. Participants <br />also suggested building long-term steady communication with <br />hunters, including to assess effects of existing management, rather <br />than only holding meetings to propose a new intervention. <br />Another study found that unclear communication of <br />environmental assessments by government agencies was a key <br />constraint to building trust among community members; and in <br />response, community members called for more consistent and <br />honest communication by the agency (Davenport et al. 2007). <br />Identifying how to improve communication is crucial because it <br />leads to other benefits for management like increased trust <br />(Davenport et al. 2007). Lack of trust has been identified as a <br />reason for past resource management conflicts between agencies <br />or decision makers and resource users (Young et al. 2016b). <br />Hunters in our study suggested that they need to continue to self - <br />organize within their hunting communities to demonstrate their <br />ability and commitment to co -management with the state. Our <br />study identified multiple layered reasons that hunters value <br />invasive species, besides just for food. Helping managers and the <br />public to understand these values is vital to enhancing trust and <br />collaboration for invasive species management. <br />CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH <br />This study aimed to identify social -cultural values and practices <br />of hunters and how understanding their values and practices can <br />aid in improving policies and collaboration for feral pig <br />management. Although interviews cannot fully represent all <br />hunters in Hawaii, they provide a rich source of information to <br />inform improved management and relationships, as well as a <br />baseline for comparison with future studies. Future studies should <br />expand our understanding of natural resource co -management <br />by exploring gender diversity, geography, and the range of <br />relationships among diverse community members (e.g., hunters, <br />large private landowners, NGOs, cultural practitioners, hikers, <br />and other user groups) that will be critical to meeting community <br />needs regarding feral pigs. <br />Results from this study demonstrate that hunters value pig <br />hunting for numerous reasons, vary in their perceptions of the <br />current state of hunting and management of hunting, and <br />recommend solutions that enhance management while expanding <br />hunting opportunities. Incorporating forms of Indigenous <br />agency, like the Indigenous and local knowledge that hunters <br />possess of feral pig behavior and distribution, can increase the <br />effectiveness of management actions, along with using place - <br />based approaches to management. This study suggests <br />engagement with local hunters may create pathways toward co - <br />management that help to reduce past conflicts between <br />government agencies and local resource users while improving <br />community participation in management of invasive species. <br />Acknowledgments: <br />The authors would like to thank all of' the hunters who participated <br />on this project for sharing their valuable stories, knowledge, and <br />time. We would also like to thank the people involved in the Hawaii <br />Wildlife Ecology Lab and Vaughan Piko for their support and <br />feedback throughout the process of' this research. Thank you to the <br />employees at the Department of Land and Natural Resources' <br />Division of' Forestry and Wildlife for sharing their time and <br />knowledge about the division regarding management priorities and <br />their perceptions of' the state's current relationships with local <br />hunters. This research was funded by the College of' Tropical <br />Agriculture & Human Resources at the University of' Hawai`i at <br />Manoa and the United States Department of Agriculture. This <br />research reports work fi^om the lead author's Masters dissertation <br />(Luat-Ha'eu, 2020 "Finding Pathways Toward Co -Management <br />of' Hawai`i's Feral Pigs (Pua`a; Sus scrofa): A Historical Review <br />of Biocultural Coevolution of' Relationships Between Hawaiians <br />and Pigs and Semi -Structured Interviews with Local Pig Hunters") <br />at the University of' Hawai`i at Manoa. <br />