My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023_07_18 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2023
>
2023_07_18 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2024 9:40:39 AM
Creation date
1/19/2024 9:44:47 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
important voice, I think, in guiding our management out there. And so, in 2006 Puuanahulu was <br />\[unclear\] over to us and so now we have the Puuwaawaa was turned into a forest reserve and <br />Puuanahulu was a game management area. Next slide. Just an important note, I guess, so while <br />that area was primarily used for grazing and cattle grazing for 150 years and because of that <br />natural, that native dry land forest was destroyed on many levels, not completely but quite a bit <br />– even though that happened we still have 15 rare plants and one rare moth that exist in the <br />area and that we are so – and because of that some of our main objectives are built around <br />protecting those species and, yeah, protecting them, OK, next slide. So now we get into the fire <br />part of it a little bit. So, this is just a slide that shows kind of a very common cycle, fire cycle <br />based around grasses. So more so the grasses and so and this we see happening at Puuwaawaa. <br />So many grasses are not native. So as they’re introduced for cattle grazing and for other reasons <br />they begin to establish and as a fire might come through the system – the grasses dry out faster <br />and they can carry that fire from just the grassland into the forest with the higher intensity than <br />might have naturally occurred before the grasses were there and so as that forest slowly or <br />quickly – it can happen both - as it burns and, there begins to be re-establishment of vegetation <br />in the area – generally those grasses can re-establish themselves much more quickly than the <br />forest can and because of that – as they dry out through a season someday, again, if there’s fire <br />they can – it just becomes kind of like an endless cycle that increases in capacity and in impact <br />over time to a point where you have no forest left and so that’s kind of just a brief overview and <br />the next slide. That’s just a picture of a pretty good fire out at Puuanahulu, and so you see just <br />mostly grass there. That’s probably what already grass but before that historically there used to <br />be a dry forest there and it’s no longer. Next slide. So, talk about the case study. Just kinda <br />driving all of that home – so in the mid-80s, 1985 – the Natural Area Reserves proposed a NARS <br />in a patch of forest that was like Highway 190 – the mauka road between Kona and Waimea - <br />transected right through this patch of kauila and lama. Next slide just to – we have some before <br />and after so it was a kauila/lama forest and shortly after that proposal was submitted there was <br />some devastating fires that went through and you have – so we’re – the next three slides are <br />just gonna be pictures of what the forest looked like and what it’s like today after those fires, so <br />there was – so next slide is probably a little bit better but we had some, oh, somebody says they <br />had – is that Leomana has wood from that forest – interesting. So next slide, this is just – that’s <br />what the forest looked like – that’s what it looks like now. Next slide, and so I guess that’s just – <br />it’s kinda just some images to show that that other slide about that cycle is, you know, we’re not <br />just making stuff up – we see these things happening on the ground – so talking about literature <br />review – it’s this research, this project out there by Blackmar and Vitousek in 2000 –I’ll just read <br />what they – kinda the general gist of what their project concluded. So even as grazing caused a <br />gradual – so – sorry I’ll take one step back – I apologize – we’ve had grazing out there for so long <br />which did cause destruction to the forest, but not all of it and this is where you kinda get your <br />Catch-22 – your 2 way sword where you have all these non-native grasses and this destruction <br />from these non-native ungulates on the forest – but what it has been – what remains is a large <br />swath of non-native, fire loving vegetation and so we’re gonna, I guess, get briefly into the best <br />way to control the fire-loving vegetation, um, is those animals that kinda caused the destruction <br />of the forest to begin with, so Blackmar and Vitousek said even as grazing causes gradual <br />declines in forest cover, however, it protects forests from rapid loss – the destructive fires – by <br />reducing the ability of grass fuels to carry fire. Grazing in drier areas reduces the risk of fire, not <br />only by controlling the accumulation of fuels but also by controlling the spread of more <br />flammable grass species, and they weren’t and now in there specifically talking about fountain <br />grass and so at Puuwaawaa there’s the mauka section of that area has a mix of fountain grass <br />but other grasses like Kikuyu, whereas the makai section of that area is pretty much only <br />6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.