Laserfiche WebLink
The lawsuit against Manono Corner LLC would be for creating an "attractive nuisance". If a <br /> building is closed at night then after-hours security will need to be addressed An empty building <br /> with places to hide in the back will attract the homeless, drug users and others who should not <br /> be on the premises. In our testimony at the January Windward Planning Commission meeting <br /> we spoke about our concerns regarding security as we have been burglarized in the past. <br /> We strongly feel the application for zone change should be denied. If this does not happen, <br /> then the following conditions are requested: <br /> 1. ZONING DEFINITION LIMITATION: No vehicle inducing establishments to <br /> be allowed with the MCX zoning change. This would eliminate any drive <br /> throughs, convenience stores, gas stations and other like entities. <br /> 2. TRAFFIC CONTROL: Applicant to place road barriers in the parking lot to <br /> dissuade auto drivers from cutting through the parking to lot to avoid the <br /> intersection. Example barriers are like the speed bumps like those found in the <br /> United States Post Office parking lot near the airport. <br /> Applicant to use existing driveway for Manono Street right only exit in <br /> concert with the Department of Public Works' written recommendation to the <br /> Planning Department. <br /> 3. LIMITED HOURS: Limit the hours of operation to 6am to 10pm. This would <br /> negate bars/lounges and 24hr entities. <br /> 4. LEAD DUST MITIGATION: Dust barrier enclosures to be erected prior to <br /> demolition of existing structures and debris clearance and construction to <br /> mitigate exposure to residential properties adjacent to and near the property of lead dust <br /> and dust in general. Our alternative is to file a complaint with the EPA <br /> which could delay demolition and construction possibly for months. <br /> 5. MITIGATION FUND: Because this development will draw a number of cars and <br /> people to it, the Landowner should be required to create a Mitigation Fund of <br /> twenty thousand dollars annually. Fund would pay for, among other things, <br /> cleaning and preventative measures, rubbish collection/removal, and installation <br /> of window awnings due to excessive vehicle headlights shining into our bedroom. <br /> Among the rubbish anticipated to be deposited along the property includes <br /> syringes, human waste and other garbage too numerous to itemize. Medical <br /> waste requires special handling and disposal. My husband and I should not be <br /> held responsible to clean up rubbish generated by and coming from Manono <br /> Corner, LLC. <br /> We are bringing these issues to your attention for your thoughtful consideration and resolution. <br /> We have already met with the property owners and Sid Fuke (their planning consultant). Mr. <br /> Fuke stated in the meeting that he would draft language addressing the vehicle producing <br /> entities but his draft language does not meet our needs or concerns. <br />