My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-01-17 Salary Commission Minutes (Draft)
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Salary Commission
>
Minutes
>
2024
>
2024-01-17 Salary Commission Minutes (Draft)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2024 3:42:03 PM
Creation date
2/26/2024 11:35:10 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Salary Commission <br />January 17, 2024 <br />MS. NAMAHOE: So, understanding or listening to what you just said, it sounds to me almost <br />that this will be the new risk management office, that they won't necessarily be an extrovert <br />member—public-facing office—as much as they will be the clearinghouse that will be in charge <br />of sea level rises or information provided to and from, as well as fighting against property and <br />casualty insurance policies. And the idea of re -writing the water tables so that I mean, is that <br />what I'm understanding it to be? <br />MS. SAKO: I think there're going to be a lot of information gatherers for sure—gathering more <br />data from the community, applying for grants. There's a lot of grants out there. So, definitely, <br />applying for grants but whether they carry out the grants or a department carries out a grant, is <br />yet to be seen. <br />And so, we're still developingso, definitely, a work -in -progress. And so, the interim <br />administrator was hired to really get the department up and going to get it started. We believe in <br />her qualifications. I think she'll do a great job but, at the same time, we don't know what all is <br />going to evolve into, yet. <br />And so, I guess, my request anyway, is to set a salary. But then, if you could agendize it for <br />maybe a year from now even, to re-evaluate to determine, "Oh, my gosh, this has grown into <br />something more than we ever thought it would be" or it's remained that their work either inter- <br />relating with the other departments. And it's a little different to just being appointed, yet <br />working as an officer and agency. <br />So, we've yet to determine if it's this department that's going to grow or if some of the other <br />departments are going to have to grow to carry out the projects. <br />MR. NELSON: So, I hear what you're saying. Are you okay with just status quo what you've <br />offered—make that good for a year and then, kind of, re-evaluate it a year from now. `Cause I <br />think that is Farahi said—he was okay with a salary that you guys proposed. <br />It sounds likeI mean, that's within the market range, kind of—and then— <br />MS. SAKO: And then, perhaps, with the 5% increase on July I't, like the other department <br />heads were offered but we'll leave that for you guys to discuss. <br />We're just saying, unfortunately, this is a work -in -progress and we don't have—it's not as <br />defined as we would like it to be, yet. <br />MR. FARAHL Mr. Chairman, it's a new department. This is very common to create a catch-all <br />kind of thing with a whole bunch of things fall into it but really nothing falls, clearly, into it. <br />And it's a combination of a whole bunch of things. <br />Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.