My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-03-04 PL-SMA-2023-000046 Leone R. Sutton Opposition Testimony
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-03-07 Windward
>
#3 Black Sand Beach, LLC (PL-SMA-2023-000046)
>
2024-03-04 PL-SMA-2023-000046 Leone R. Sutton Opposition Testimony
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2024 6:15:53 PM
Creation date
3/4/2024 6:15:47 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mother turtles are very sensitive to activity on the beach and will not come up to lay <br /> eggs unless they feel safe. Carrying a heavy load of approximately 180 eggs, they may <br /> watch for days to access the safety of a beach. If she is unable to find a suitable <br /> location, she may release her eggs into the ocean. <br /> I'm very concerned about the increase in light caused by additional people on the <br /> beach, car traffic and stationary lights that would come with development. Any <br /> additional lights and increased beach activity during the nesting season (May through <br /> December) will have a negative impact on honu mothers and keiki. The proposed <br /> Punalu'u Village plans include an open market, public restroom, fish market and <br /> restaurant that are very close to the predominate turtle nesting habitat at Punalu'u. Also, <br /> the proposed Colony 2 of 63 Condominiums may have negative light impacts on <br /> another important nesting area known as Kaloa. <br /> can not, in good conscience, support the development of the beach front at Punalu'u. <br /> Beyond the critically endangered hawksbills, there are several other points of concern: <br /> * First, regarding public commentary, having an important community meeting on a <br /> weekday doesn't offer adequate opportunity for the working people of Ka'u to attend. <br /> Please add an additional planning meeting on a Saturday. <br /> *We need an Environmental Impact Statement, since the current one is more than 50 <br /> years old. Deciding to move forward without one feels disrespectful to our community <br /> and to the aina, and does not feel in integrity or pono. <br /> *There is no disaster mitigation plan. Pele can be unpredictable and things can change <br /> very quickly here. The beach is already reaching capacity and building a development <br /> that is not coastal dependent within 200 feet of the high tide mark puts people and <br /> facilities in danger. Tsunamis, earthquakes, flooding, many other potential hazards need <br /> to be considered and anticipated — if not, there could be huge losses and liabilities. <br /> *There is no burial treatment plan in place. <br /> * Building condos at Punalu'u will most definitely increase our property taxes. <br /> *There needs to be an updated shore assessment and setback. This certification is <br /> especially important when there are plans to put a cafe about 100 feet from the beach, <br /> as seen in the proposed village diagram, #15. <br /> *The owner has listed 143 acres as conservation, which currently is planned from one <br /> fish pond to another. If this was extended to reach the boat ramp, it would ensure much <br /> better environmental protection for the hawksbill turtles, green sea turtles and the <br /> Hawaiian monk seal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.