My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-03-04 PL-SMA-2023-000046 Alex Williamson Opposition Testimony
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-03-07 Windward
>
#3 Black Sand Beach, LLC (PL-SMA-2023-000046)
>
2024-03-04 PL-SMA-2023-000046 Alex Williamson Opposition Testimony
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2024 7:32:31 PM
Creation date
3/4/2024 7:32:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Dear County of Hawai'i, <br /> As a resident and humble guest on this beautiful land, as well as a student of the University of <br /> Hawai'i, I write to bring to your attention something of great importance. I take this opportunity <br /> to voice my concerns about the contemplated development of Punalu'u and the coastline of Ka`u. <br /> I strongly urge my fellow residents and authorities to consider the sustainable management <br /> assessments (SMAs)that are being proposed to Punalu'u. This matter is one that, I believe, steps <br /> beyond the bounds of real estate and urban planning, reaching into realms of historical <br /> preservation, cultural conservation and, ultimately, respect for those who have long since called <br /> this place home. <br /> Firstly, there looms a key concern about indigenous burial grounds. To say that these grounds are <br /> an integral part of the spiritual fabric of the Native people is an understatement. Regrettably, they <br /> have not been properly surveyed. Building on this land is an indelicate imposition to the <br /> indigenous residents and marks an unfortunate echo of colonial endeavors that disrespected <br /> indigenous ways of life worldwide. <br /> The beautiful creatures that depend on the shores of Punalu'u, the turtles, form another <br /> cornerstone to the argument against the proposed development. These majestic beings have long <br /> been revered as a symbol of good luck and endurance, integral not only to the ecosystem but also <br /> to the cultural significance of this land. <br /> Consider Na`alehu - a town once situated closer to the shore, upended and ultimately relocated <br /> due to the devastation wrought by a tsunami. Would it not be prudent to learn from past <br /> experiences and avoid risking both lives and property in such a hazardous location? Embarking <br /> on a similar course of action repeats the same cycle, wherein we pay more in terms of cost and <br /> human life in the face of foreseeable natural disasters. <br /> The call for a shoreline certification is imperative, especially when taking into account the <br /> proposed Beach Club Cafe's nearness to the beach. Considerations of respect and care come into <br /> play when dealing with potential discoveries of human remains, which may present a possibility <br /> given the close proximity to native burial grounds. The nature of the Archaeological Resources <br /> Protection Act permit adds weight to the importance of comprehensive project planning, <br /> encapsulating a prompt and effective consultation process for unexpected findings. Therefore, <br /> moving forward without a shoreline certification could result in hasty consultations, legal <br /> challenges, and possibly substantial penalties. <br /> In conclusion, it's non-negotiable: a shoreline certification is obligatory for the safe and legally <br /> compliant progression of this project. Let us not impair the harmony of our Hawai'i landscape or <br /> violate the resting places of our community's ancestors. Let's make sure the demands and rights <br /> of the Ka'u residents are upheld. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.