My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-02-27 PL-SMA-2023-000038 Bill and Cindy Armer Opposition Testimony
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-02-29 Leeward
>
#4 Kona Hawai'i Development, LLC (PL-SMA-2023-000038)
>
Additional Info Provided to Commissioners at 2-29-24 Hearing
>
2024-02-27 PL-SMA-2023-000038 Bill and Cindy Armer Opposition Testimony
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2024 7:41:55 AM
Creation date
3/8/2024 7:41:49 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Proposals are routed to the 15-20 county department heads for them to identify <br /> any issues that will impact their area of responsibility. Why are there no red flags <br /> from police, fire, civil defense, medical, water and sewage, engineering, DOT and <br /> all the other salaried department heads on this project? Every segment of county <br /> government will all be severely stressed by the magnitude and location of this <br /> project. <br /> • The applicant did not submit traffic studies, safety proposals, pedestrian usage <br /> data, vehicle speed recommendations, a neighborhood communication plan, or <br /> traffic routing considerations for those turning into/out of the applicant entrance <br /> on North Kahakai Rd, from heavily traveled AM Drive. Alii Drive is the most used <br /> coastal road from Kailua Village to Keauhou, with only 6 mauka-makai <br /> connectors between Palani and Kamehmeha III Hwy. During the hours of 4:30 <br /> am and 10:00 pm there is no busier thoroughfare in Hawaii County with walkers, <br /> runners, strollers, auto, bicyclists, and dog walkers. During emergency coastal <br /> evacuations, there is no bigger bottleneck of panicked visitors seeking higher <br /> ground. <br /> • The neighborhood is already impacted by Royal Kona Hotel's 430 rooms and to <br /> propose a 100+room hotel on the adjacent southern property boundary is the <br /> height of developer arrogance. The applicant claims sufficient parking spaces <br /> but our experience is that inadequate parking is ever-present for all the existing <br /> tenants on AM Drive especially during events, holidays, and high season. Over <br /> three hundred people will be housed and working daily at this facility with no <br /> ocean frontage to even view the ocean. There is no question that they will <br /> migrate 24 hours a day onto all the adjacent properties--especially the green <br /> frontage area at Kona Reef. Kona Reef will need to purchase three gated <br /> entrances to our property in order to not be overrun by trespassers with nowhere <br /> else to park. <br /> The applicant is proposing to build a 40 foot tall structure on top of an existing <br /> concrete foundation. However, the construction site is located on a slope such that <br /> the makai side of the structure would be 74 feet above ground level. This clearly <br /> violates Hawaii County Zoning Code (Sect. 25-5-93)which explicitly limits the height <br /> of buildings in hoteilresort areas to 45 feet. This concrete facility is perched on top of <br /> a massive lava tube that was filled with concrete over the course of several months <br /> around 15 years ago and now they propose to add four stories of concrete on top of <br /> that precarious foundation. <br /> * The proposed 100 "Room" hotel would actually consist of 9 standard guest rooms <br /> and 91 2-bedroom suites. At 80% occupancy, there would be over 300 guests plus the <br /> necessary hotel support staff to squeeze into the 143 proposed parking spaces. The <br /> additional cars would greatly exacerbate the traffic congestion and parking issues <br /> already existing in Kailua Kona. Yet the developer has not conducted nor even <br /> requested a traffic and pedestrian safety study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.