My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-02-28 PL-CCH-2023-000019 Jana Cook Additional Testimony
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-02-29 Leeward
>
#4 Kona Hawai'i Development, LLC (PL-SMA-2023-000038)
>
Additional Info Provided to Commissioners at 2-29-24 Hearing
>
2024-02-28 PL-CCH-2023-000019 Jana Cook Additional Testimony
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2024 7:45:38 AM
Creation date
3/8/2024 7:45:14 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
23 Nature Pointe Drive <br /> Tijeras, NM 87059 <br /> January 9, 2024 <br /> Leeward Planning Commission <br /> County of Hawaii, East Hawaii Office <br /> 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 <br /> Hilo, HI 96720 <br /> Re: SMA Use Permit Application (PL-SMA-2023-000038) TMK: 7-5-018:011 <br /> Dear Leeward Planning Commission, <br /> Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on the recent SMA Use Permit Application (PL-SMA- <br /> 2023-000038) to be discussed at a Public Hearing on January 18, 2024. <br /> For the past 7 years, we have owned a condominium located at 75-5888 Ali'i Drive (Kona Reef), D-8 in <br /> Kailua Kona which is located diagonally across Kahakai Road from the proposed 100-room hotel <br /> described in the SMA application. We have reviewed the information packet provided by the Planning <br /> Consultant and have several questions and concerns regarding the proposed building that we hope you <br /> will consider and address: <br /> 1) The building site is located on a slope as the Planning Consultant knows well. While the <br /> proposed building will only be 40 feet tall as viewed from Ali'i Drive (maximum allowable height <br /> is 45 feet), it will be substantially taller(-65 feet) on the makai (west) side of the building as <br /> viewed from Kahakai Road (see attached photos). Those of us who live immediately beside <br /> (Kona Reef Condominium residents) or behind the building (Hale Kona Kai Condominium <br /> residents, 1 homeowner, and 1 business owner) would literally be overshadowed by this <br /> massive structure. <br /> We note that neither the actual height of the building on the makai side, nor artistic renderings <br /> of the resultant narrow canyon this building would create along Kahakai Road are included in <br /> the information packets provided by the Planning Consultant. We believe this information was <br /> deliberately withheld in order to downplay the huge impact this proposed building would have <br /> on adjacent residents. Furthermore, allowing a building that would be taller than the maximum <br /> allowable height of 45 feet around the majority(>60%) of its perimeter would set a dangerous <br /> precedent for the approval of future buildings. Exactly how much of a building would need to <br /> be in compliance with building regulations in order to be approved? For these reasons,we <br /> respectfully request that the maximum height of the building be limited to 45 feet as <br /> measured from the lowest ground level on Kahakai Road. <br /> 2) The proposed building plans indicate that the entrance/exit for the hotel would be on the south <br /> side of the building onto Kahakai Road. Presumably, many of the cars would exit to the left <br /> (east-bound) up the hill to the intersection of Kahakai Road and Ali'i Drive. There is already <br /> substantial car and pedestrian traffic at that 3-way intersection. Furthermore, it is hazardous for <br /> cars to turn from Kahakai Road onto Ali'i Drive because the cross-traffic does not stop, the <br /> speed limit is 35 mph, and the visibility is very limited due to adjacent structures and vegetation. <br /> While the Planning Consultant mentions that the proposed structure would be a 100-room <br /> hotel, he fails to mention that the total number of guests would be 344 at full occupancy(we <br /> had to find this number on Exhibit F, Water Use Calculation Report of the SMA application.) <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.