Laserfiche WebLink
propose that a main entrance to the hotel would be not only better suited on the busier road, <br /> Ali'i Drive, for accessibility to parking but also for visibility of the hotel main facade, as is the <br /> case with the Club Wyndham Hawaiian Resort, and many other condominium complexes a <br /> short distance south of this proposed hotel. <br /> 3- Are there additional and improved parking spaces planned on Kahakai for the exponential <br /> increase in vehicles due to this hotel? There are a total of 145 parking spaces shown in the <br /> architectural plan of the 150 room hotel, which is not taking into account the other 5+ hotel <br /> guest's, staff and employee vehicle parking. Where will the overflow hotel vehicles park? <br /> Kahakai Rd will be additionally burdened by the inadequate parking, taking away spaces for <br /> the other Kahakai businesses, condominium contractors, staff and guests where parking is <br /> currently less than adequate. <br /> 4- Without the erroneous landscaping buffer on the west/Kahakai Rd side of the hotel, noise <br /> from open lanai's and pool/recreation areas of the 110+room, 3 story hotel will bounce and <br /> then travel out the U-configuration and directly to the front doors of the Hale Kona Kai <br /> condominium units, impacting the quality of life of owners and guests and also the visibility of <br /> the mountain. The hotel elevation drawings, especially of the south and west elevations, are <br /> notably missing from the drawing set, so while the Ali'i Drive east perimeter height is said to <br /> be under the limit of 45 feet, Kahakai Rd with it's east to western slope means that the hotel's <br /> western first floor level, which begins on top of the basement parking area, most certainly will <br /> be higher than 45 feet, looming over diminutive Hale Kona Kai and more importantly will rise <br /> above the County legal building height limits. We request all elevation drawings be submitted <br /> to all owners within 300 feet of the perimeter boundary of subject property. <br /> 5- We suspect that the sewer, water, and utility requirements and usage for what was the <br /> approved 48 unit condotel has changed drastically for a densely populated, 100+room hotel <br /> on what is essentially a minor residential street. We would anticipate many utility and <br /> environmental problems unless the existing infrastructure of the property and adjacent streets <br /> are expanded and improved. <br /> We look forward to your response, corrections, and submittal of missing items at your earliest <br /> convenience. <br /> Respectfully, <br /> Jan and Richard Dodge <br />