Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Bertsch felt that specific budget matters must come from the Chief, <br />where the information would be delivered correctly and accurately. <br />Chair Bowles agreed with Commissioner Bertsch, however, felt it imperative on <br />the part of the commission to have an opportunity to discuss future direction as <br />they approach critical times and urged the commission to become engaged in it. <br />He encouraged each commissioner to make time to discuss matters with the chief <br />and his staff and pointed out that according to the Charter, the commission has <br />that responsibility. The Chair shared that he has been working the budget since <br />the foundation of the commission, and that it’s never been as critical as it is now. <br />Commissioner Kaoiwi shared that he understood both Chair Bowles’ point and <br />Commissioner Bertsch’s point, and had concerns with regard to some of the <br />vacant positions that may be eliminated which may lead to TAing of staff, which <br />would still be costly, and nothing would be gained. <br />Deputy Corporation Counsel (DCC) Gonzales appreciated the Chair’s desire for <br />the commission to start thinking ahead as the budget issue would be forthcoming. <br />He reminded the commission that their role in the budget, by Charter, is the <br />review of the annual budget prepared by the Chief. Once the Chief prepares his <br />budget and has it, it’s not a draft, nor a concept of possibilities as was related by <br />Vice Chair Robinson. That’s when the discussion really begins. DCC Gonzales <br />believed that the chair was trying to ready the commission with their questions <br />and is advising them to start the dialogue as soon as possible and to be ready <br />with their questions. DCC Gonzales also agreed that Commissioner Bertsch’s <br />concern that specifics on what may have been discussed cast in the wrong light <br />can create negativity that the department or commission doesn’t need. However, <br />DCC Gonzales felt that Commissioner Robinson’s report didn’t appear to be <br />conveying the chief’s plan, but of possible options. He reminded the commission <br />that the annual budget isn’t prepared yet, but when it does come up for review, <br />that’s when suggestions and dialogue will occur between the administration and <br />the commission. Then, the commission makes its recommendation to the Mayor’s <br />Office and the Managing Director. He reminded the commission to remember to <br />work within their role and start working on questions to ask, such as, “What kind of <br />alternatives can be pitched to the chief, if it’s not already in his budget plan?” <br />DCC Gonzales stated that the discussion was fine and that it was part of the <br />Budget and Finance report as an issue on the near horizon. <br />Chair Bowles voiced that one of the problems the commission has experienced is <br />waiting until the budget is hard. The department needs the commission’s support <br />as it’s been in an uphill battle building the department since 2000. Having some <br />financial decisions made by the State with respect to the County of the Tourism <br />Tax may place the department in a very serious position. The commission has a <br />responsibility to provide services. Members of this commission should be having <br />budget discussions with the chief. <br />10 <br /> <br />