My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-03-04 PL-SMA-2023-000046 Elsa Dedman Opposition Testimony
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-03-07 Windward
>
#3 Black Sand Beach, LLC (PL-SMA-2023-000046)
>
Additional Info Provided to Commission at 3-7-24 Hearing
>
2024-03-04 PL-SMA-2023-000046 Elsa Dedman Opposition Testimony
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2024 10:55:20 AM
Creation date
3/6/2024 10:55:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
3/4/2024
Description
2024-03-04 PL-SMA-2023-000046 Elsa Dedman Opposition Testimony
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• SMAA, Pg. 25 General plan: The Project Site is designated as a Minor Resort <br /> Area by the General Plan, that designates this area as accommodating no more <br /> than 500 visitor units and providing both active and passive recreational <br /> opportunities commensurate with the scale of development. This is <br /> misinformation as the general cost of minor resort is less than 500,000 dollars. <br /> This development is estimated to have a cost of 200-350 million dollars; which, <br /> clearly exceeds a minor development; therefore, this is a major resort. <br /> The number of units far exceed the 500 units will include: existing colony 1, 76 <br /> units, colony 2, 63 units, Aspen 30 units, Village, 260 units and the 550 units on <br /> the Ninole-Punalu'u Supplemental Zone Map Section 25-8-28. The total unit <br /> between the completed plan is approximately, 979 units. This total amount of <br /> units makes this minor resort a major resort. <br /> • During the time of the first development over a 100 of cultural, historic and <br /> archeological site were destroyed since the project area first began to receive <br /> application approvals and the extent of harm to the cultural landscape and <br /> traditional and customary practices need to be explicitly discussed and <br /> monitored. The mitigation measures from 1988 were not applied due to neglect. <br /> As an example, DLNR,TMK: (3) 9-6-00: 002 were injured and altered during the <br /> course of land alteration activities on 26 June 2017 destruction occurred with <br /> removal of stacked wall which paralleled the shoreline at the wharf. Two <br /> separate piles of concrete rubble remain within the 40-foot set back area where <br /> the operator identified as Simon Vilaj of Hang Loose Tours had demolished two <br /> historical concrete structures. Should there be a storm type wave action piles of <br /> concrete rubble and soil may enter into the ocean. This destruction was <br /> conducted by the previous owner Roberts Hawaii who illegally grub the wharf <br /> area with intent to increase the boat ramp size for tours. This was conducted in <br /> the area of the Punalu'unui Heaiu and moehai pohaku the sacrificial stone. This <br /> was desecration of the historic sugar plantation warehouse structure. The SEIS <br /> will require inventory survey and monitoring the site activity to ensure no <br /> damage. <br /> • Social economic values have changed since rezoning and redistricting of this area <br /> since its first occurrence. For instance, Article XI did not exist, nor did Supreme <br /> Court rulings to protect public trust resources, traditional and customary rights. <br /> The C. Brewer Development contaminated our water wells from plantation and <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.