My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-03-05 PL-SMA-2023-000046 Tara Schmeling Opposition Testimony
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-03-07 Windward
>
#3 Black Sand Beach, LLC (PL-SMA-2023-000046)
>
Additional Info Provided to Commission at 3-7-24 Hearing
>
2024-03-05 PL-SMA-2023-000046 Tara Schmeling Opposition Testimony
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2024 8:01:33 PM
Creation date
3/10/2024 6:23:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
3/5/2024
Other Parcel Numbers
950190150000, 024, 026, 030, 031, 033, 035; 96001001-003, 011-013; 960020080000, 037, 038, 041, 053
Permit Number
PL-SMA-2023-000046
Parcel Number
950190110000
Description
Opposition testimony
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From: Tara Schmelino <br /> To: W PCtesti mono <br /> Subject: Punalu"u <br /> Date: Tuesday, March 5,2024 11:22:38 PM <br /> County of Hawaii - Windward Planning Commission (March 7th 2024 Meeting) <br /> Testimony in OPPOSITION of the Black Sand Beach LLC Application for an SMA(PL-SMA-2023- <br /> 000046) <br /> Aloha Commissioners, <br /> Mahalo for your time and efforts as part of the County of Hawaii Windward Planning Commission. I <br /> am writing to share my testimony in OPPOSITION of the Black Sand Beach LLC Application for an <br /> SMA(PL-SMA-2023-000046). <br /> I have two main reasons for my OPPOSITION of this application: <br /> 1. The application does not meet the requirements of the related governing legislature <br /> (HRS Chapter 205-26(2)(a)). HRS Chapter 205-26(2)(a) notes that an application must <br /> demonstrate that the development will not have any substantial adverse <br /> environmental or ecological effect, except as such adverse effect is minimized to the <br /> extent practicable and clearly outweighed by public health, safety or compelling public <br /> interests. A new and comprehensive environmental impact study needs to be <br /> completed along with an updated shore assessment before any conclusions can be <br /> made on the true environmental or ecological effects of development at Punalu'u. <br /> 2. The application lacks a comprehensive understanding of the significant cultural and <br /> socio-economic aspects that hold utmost importance to native Hawaiians and long- <br /> time residents of Punalu'u. While acknowledging the intention of progress and <br /> revitalization, the application fails to demonstrate a sustained and overall benefit to <br /> the native Hawaiians and long-time residents who have nurtured Punalu'u for <br /> generations. It does not provide evidence of how sustainable economic benefits will <br /> be achieved, such as creating a diverse range of skilled labor jobs with living wages <br /> that enable local families to thrive. Additionally, the application does not outline a <br /> plan for the proper preservation of cultural practices and sacred sites, ensuring their <br /> perpetual care and monitoring by knowledgeable stewards. <br /> Mahalo for your careful consideration. <br /> Tara Schmeling <br /> tischmeling55 gmail.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.