My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-02-23 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2024
>
2024-02-23 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2024 9:18:45 AM
Creation date
3/13/2024 9:17:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Merit Appeals Board <br />February 23, 2024 <br />CHR. CABANAS: Well, it'sI mean, this is just a draft, so we can amend it—the Chair needs <br />input and that's why we are reviewing it today to make it more user-friendly. So, besides <br />putting, like, for instance, the second sentence, "will notify you, the Appellant" what else <br />would you suggest we change to make it more in lay terms. <br />MS. MATHEWS: May I suggest we defer this for a month and yes, I'm sorry, I didn't go <br />through this—and see if we can't—I'll take stab at this and <br />CHR. CABANAS: Okay. <br />MS. MATHEWS: we can't actually exchange it via email <br />CHR. CABANAS: No. <br />MS. MATHEWS: prior so that people can have input and we can do it—the real world does, <br />which is work collaboratively, rather than— <br />CHR. CABANAS: May I suggest that I like the idea that we allow Board members time to <br />review it. May I suggest that you review it and submit any changes to the document to our <br />secretary -reporter. `Cause we still have to follow Sunshine Laws and we can't discuss it among <br />ourselves unless we're meeting here in our Board meeting. <br />So, submit your suggestions to our secretary -reporter. And I think we should have a deadline so <br />that Glynis can compile everything and then we can review it at our March 12'h meeting. <br />MS. DE SOTO: Can I make a suggestion? <br />CHR. CABANAS: Sure. <br />MS. DE SOTO: That this document, in and of itself, may not be the full answer. I think it's <br />important to use this language, `cause this is the language that the appellant will be faced with <br />when they're sitting. So, I do think it helps bridge their knowledge base and that comfort level. <br />But I think what's also important that we've talked about is what—how do people become aware <br />of their rights. Their rights to appeal. How are employees trained on those rights. And, to me, <br />that's where the more lay person language could potentially lie, is in that front-end work of <br />making sure that all employees understand their rights, and that they understand there's a formal <br />process, and once you file you will receive all the details of that formal process. <br />And so, that way they feel they can see the path, they can see the steps of what they will get, <br />when they will get it—and, hopefully, feel a little more empowered and time—'cause Iif I got <br />this, I would immediately look at this and go—I wouldn't necessarily be intimidated but I would <br />look at it and say, "Okay, what don't I understand? How do I prepare?" It's a guide map for <br />that. <br />Page 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.