Laserfiche WebLink
COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT,CHAPTER 205A,HRS S N/S N/A <br /> (Key:S=Supportive,N/S=Not Supportive,N/A=Not Applicable <br /> be provided in other areas; <br /> (ii) Requiring replacement of coastal resources having significant recreational value X <br /> including,but not limited to,surfing sites,fishponds,and sand beaches,when such <br /> resources will be unavoidably damaged by development; or requiring reasonable <br /> monetary compensation to the State for recreation when replacement is not feasible <br /> or desirable; <br /> (iii) Providing and managing adequate public access, consistent with conservation of X <br /> natural resources,to and along shorelines with recreational value; <br /> (iv) Providing an adequate supply of shoreline parks and other recreational facilities X <br /> suitable for public recreation; <br /> (v) Ensuring public recreational uses of county, state, and federally owned or X <br /> controlled shoreline lands and waters having recreational value consistent with <br /> public safety standards and conservation of natural resources; <br /> (vi) Adopting water quality standards and regulating point and nonpoint sources of X <br /> pollution to protect, and where feasible, restore the recreational value of coastal <br /> waters; <br /> (vii) Developing new shoreline recreational opportunities, where appropriate, such as X <br /> artificial lagoons,artificial beaches,and artificial reefs for surfing and fishing;and <br /> (viii) Encouraging reasonable dedication of shoreline areas with recreational value for X <br /> public use as part of discretionary approvals or permits by the land use commission, <br /> board of land and natural resources, and county authorities; and crediting such <br /> dedication against the requirements of section 46-6. <br /> Discussion: The proposed Winter Farm project will not obstruct lateral public shoreline access.Because the <br /> grading necessary for the project is greater than one acre,a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System <br /> (NPDES)permit application is being prepared for the Project and will be submitted soon.The NPDES permit <br /> process underway will assure no adverse impact to recreation at the shoreline. <br /> Historic Resources <br /> Objective:(A)Protect,preserve, and, where desirable, restore those natural and manmade historic and <br /> prehistoric resources in the coastal zone management area that are significant in Hawaiian andAmerican <br /> history and culture. <br /> Policies: <br /> (A) Identify and analyze significant archaeological resources; X <br /> (B) Maximize information retention through preservation of remains and artifacts or salvage X <br /> operations;and <br /> (C) Support state goals for protection, restoration, interpretation, and display of historic X <br /> resources. <br /> Discussion:As noted earlier,the AIS identified four sites with a total of eight features(Exhibit 19).The sites <br /> consist of an historic road(Site 50-10-08-31348),a complex of five terraces interpreted as historic agricultural <br /> features(Site 50-10-08-31349),a terrace interpreted as an historic/modem temporary encampment(Site 50-10- <br /> 08-31350),and a livestock control wall(Site 50-10-08-31351).According to the AIS,"No traditional Hawaiian <br /> sites were identified in the project area.This is not unexpected because of the extensive mechanized cultivation <br /> of sugar cane that would have destroyed most evidence of the traditional use of the area."The documentation of <br /> Site 31348,31349,31350,and 31351 adequately documents them and no further work or preservation is <br /> recommended. <br /> In the event of discovery of anyunidentified sites or remains,such as artifacts,shell,bone or charcoal deposits, <br /> human burials,rock or coral alignments,pavings or walls,all work in the immediate area shall cease. The <br /> Planning Director shall be immediately notified. Work will only proceed with an archaeological clearance from <br /> the Planning Director. The archaeological clearance requires a finding that sufficient mitigative measures are <br /> 11 <br />