My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-03-31 PL-CCI-2024-000003 Bill 121 Doug Howell Testimony
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-04-18 Leeward
>
#7 County Council Initiated - Bill No. 121 (PL-CCI-2024-000003)
>
2024-03-31 PL-CCI-2024-000003 Bill 121 Doug Howell Testimony
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2024 5:12:54 PM
Creation date
4/5/2024 6:54:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
3/31/2024
Description
Bill 121 Doug Howell Testimony
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The bill's approach to regulating where hosts live in relation to their guests is overly <br /> restrictive and fails to consider the diverse living arrangements that exist within our <br /> community. I recommend that the Planning Commission advocate for the removal of <br /> restrictions about where hosts live and where guests stay, as long as the owner is in the <br /> same building, on the same parcel, or on an adjacent parcel. <br /> According to the legislation's own website (hicountytar.consider.it), the results are already <br /> in. respondents overwhelmingly approve of Transient Accommodation Rentals. They <br /> overwhelmingly disagree that TARS take away from housing opportunities. They <br /> overwhelmingly agree that TARS add to the LOCAL economy. Please read the website you <br /> created for the purpose of getting community feedback, and you'll see very clearly what <br /> your constituents think about the proposed legislation. <br /> Since one of our—and your—biggest concerns is the impact of the proposed laws on our <br /> area's economy, please consider who benefits from the income you propose to eliminate. <br /> In the case of Puna rentals, the income goes in large part to local service providers such as <br /> cleaners, yard maintenance workers, handyman services, local markets and restaurants, <br /> pest control, and the list goes on. Not to mention that visitors who stay in Puna purchase <br /> many of their daily living necessities in Puna, in their LOCAL district, rather than adding to <br /> the bottom line of out-of-state corporations. <br /> Our state and county depend on tourists to survive. The rentals threatened by the TAR <br /> legislation make up an important part of Hawaii County's tourist housing portfolio. Or <br /> does the county only want to accept elite travelers? I have believed that Hawaii stands for <br /> diversity, not only in race, religion and other social areas but in economic level. The visitors <br /> who may one day make our 'ohana the strongest may be the poorest. What options will <br /> we provide for them? What options for the agri-tourists who are drawn to Hawai'i's 'aina- <br /> friendly environment and way of life? We should be helping our renters to become the <br /> best renters in the world, not strangling their ability to show aloha to strangers. <br /> We know people who are renting to Hawaii residents who are in transition and need <br /> affordable, short-term housing. Where will they find it if this legislation passes? <br /> Please do not pass what I consider to be a rash and overbearing legislative solution in <br /> search of a problem. <br /> Thank you for considering my concerns and recommendations. I hope that the Planning <br /> Commission will take these points into account and work towards regulations that make <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.