Laserfiche WebLink
Case 1:22-cv-00247-DKW-RT Document 85 Filed 12/21/23 Page 7 of 28 PagelD.3067 <br /> Consequently, on July 7, 2022, HILSTRA moved for a preliminary <br /> injunction, seeking to enjoin the enforcement of Ordinance 22-7 as conflict- <br /> preempted by FIRS § 464(a) and constitutional takings principles. Dkt. No. 13. <br /> On October 13, 2022, the Court granted the motion, finding that HILSTRA was <br /> likely to succeed on the merits of those claims, and issued a preliminary injunction <br /> against the enforcement or implementation of Ordinance 22-7 insofar as it <br /> prohibited 30-89 day home rentals, or the advertisement thereof, in any district on <br /> Oahu. Dkt. No. 31. <br /> The parties subsequently agreed that the claims could be resolved on cross- <br /> motions for summary judgment. See Dkt. No. 43. Accordingly, on July 31, 2023, <br /> HILSTRA filed a motion for summary judgment, see Dkt. No. 60, and the City, <br /> DPP, and Takeuchi-Apuna filed three cross-motions for partial summary judgment <br /> on Counts III—VI, see Dkt. Nos. 62, 64 & 66. The parties filed their respective <br /> oppositions on November 9 & 10, 2023, see Dkt. Nos. 72, 74, 76, 77, and replies <br /> on November 17, 2023, see Dkt. Nos. 80-83. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c), the <br /> Court elected to decide these matters without a hearing. See Dkt. No. 84. This <br /> Order follows. <br /> - 7 - <br />