Laserfiche WebLink
vote. Look at the testimony on these bills that occurred recently on January 23, 2024: the overwhelming and <br /> very nearly unanimous testimony on these bills 121, 122& 123: IT IS IN OPPOSITION. <br /> However, and notwithstanding this overwhelming opposition to Bill 121,by members of our community, <br /> from business trade associations, from small farm owners and managers, from indviduals whose livlihoods <br /> depend on these vacation rentals for their incomes as housekeepers and maintenance staff,the County Council <br /> members abjectly ignored this,and incredulously, voted in favor of these bills, This intentional ignoring of the <br /> plainly expressed wishes of the Hawaii County constituents can no longer be abided. <br /> There are those who contend that vacation rentals reduce the availability of long-term housing, or make <br /> it more expensive due to scarcity,yet there are no statistical reports which support such a notion.On the <br /> contrary, rendering these vacation and Hawaii experience rentals as "illegal' causes drastic loss of property <br /> caretaker and rental preparation jobs. It also takes GET,TAT and other tax revenue streams off the table,and <br /> would reduce our county and state tax resources. <br /> Hawaii County is essentially the last place in the entire state of Hawaii where there remain afforable <br /> places to live. But this teeters on the precipice of dissappearing. Lack of economical dwellings is NOT caused <br /> by housing units being utilized—or even partially utilized(as in the cases of room rental, or rural ag dwelling <br /> experience farms)—as short-term vacation rentals. The dearth of available economical housing is directly caused <br /> by a)increasingly(and absurdly innapropriate for our locale)onerous building codes that may be relevant for <br /> California,but not here;b)construction material costs; c)construction labor costs, and d) sharply increasing land <br /> costs. While no governmental action is going to reduce b,c &d,rational governmental action could further the <br /> objective of providing economical dwellings by way of a building code which allows simple frame and single- <br /> wall structures (the same as homes that most of us have lived at some time in our lives here, many of which still <br /> stand and provide shelter for island families), metal roof on rafters,pier blocks and simple plumbing and <br /> electrical service. Yet building codes do not allow us to build economical homes any more.This can change. <br /> This being the case,my lone voice is not what matters.Nor should these many new and onerous rules <br /> regarding vacation and farm experience rentals, or increasingly costly building code requirements be enacted by <br /> a county council or administrative staff.These must be placed for public vote, if we are to preserve any notion <br /> that we are a democratic society, and that our laws and rules are the preference of the majority of persons,rather <br /> than a few in governmental positions that pretend to know what is best for, and desired by,the people of the <br /> County and State of Hawaii. Indeed, it is nothing short of an egregious dereliction of the duties of council <br /> members to ignore the clearly expressed positions of their constituents. <br /> I therefore recommend that Bill 121 be rejected, and instead placed for public vote,pertaining to both <br /> STVR and farm experience operations, as well as review of recent building code requirements that are causing <br /> economical homes to have become impossible to construct. <br /> Council members,you are commissioned with a kuleana to act in accord with the wishes of the statisical <br /> majority of constituents. We have communicated overwhelmingly that you are to reject Bill 121. Therefore, <br /> please do so, and reject this attempt to impose detrimental restrictions on short-term vacation rentals. <br /> Submitted by, <br /> Chuck Barker <br /> Principal, Kuleana Mortgage LLC <br />