Laserfiche WebLink
kupuna/cultural practitioners, kuleana land owners, the archaeologist and the development <br /> planners to record all the burial areas that are not recorded in the archaeology report or <br /> Master Plan." This is an essential step to discovering burial sites so that those areas are <br /> not disturbed. According to the DLNR https://files.hawaii.aov/dlnr/shpd/rules/300.pdf to <br /> request preservation, which is what I assume will be done after the archaeologists and <br /> cultural practitioners find burial sites, "The applicant shall submit a request to preserve in <br /> place or relocate a Native Hawaiian burial site to the department in the form of a burial <br /> treatment plan." Therefore, a burial treatment plan should be put in place before any <br /> construction or development plan is approved. No plans of burial treatment were stated in <br /> the development plan other than when construction would begin. To quote, "Before any <br /> future construction is started, an additional burial treatment plan for inadvertent burials or <br /> re-burials is recommended that includes cultural protocols (i.e. re-wrapping iwi kupuna, <br /> ceremony, etc.) as well as State and County regulations." If this is true, the burial treatment <br /> plan is then said to be created after development approval. The walk-through to record <br /> burial sites must happen before planning to develop if burial sites be uncovered, <br /> desecrated, and disrespected. To further rectify this, a burial treatment plan needs to be <br /> done before any development plans are approved. If the development plans are approved <br /> and burial sites are uncovered, what will happen? How will the applicant move forward? <br /> Will the development plan be changed? These are questions that could be answered by <br /> including a burial treatment plan. Aside from burials, there are living consequences that <br /> must be dealt with. <br /> Every living person creates waste but finding a place to put it is where the problems lie. For <br /> wastewater alone, Punaluu`s sewage systems will not be able to accommodate both its <br /> residents and visitors. According to https://ecoseptic.com, "the average person produces <br /> about 80-100 gallons of wastewater per day." With this in mind, the development plan <br /> states that "The existing WWTP was constructed in 1972 with a design capacity of 100,000 <br /> gallons per day (gpd). Historical flow records indicate that the daily processed flow is <br /> approximately 10,000 gpd." If the historical flow records do indicate that the daily processed <br /> flow is approximately 10,000 gpd and that 1 person produces around 80-100 gallons a day, <br /> that means that this statistic only accounts for 100 people and their daily water waste at <br /> Punaluu. I believe there are more than 100 people that visit Punaluu a day. Punaluu is 1 of <br /> the 11 Black Sand beaches on Hawaii island, widely known for its turtle population, and is a <br /> frequent tour bus stop, so it is hard to believe that the WWTP only accounts for 10,000 gpd <br /> or 100 people's wastewater a day. According to the development plan, "The Project Site is <br />