My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-03-04 PL-SMA-2023-000046 Kinohi Neves Opposition Testimony
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-05-06 Windward Special Meeting
>
Public Testimonies 2-17-24 thru 5-3-24
>
2024-03-04 PL-SMA-2023-000046 Kinohi Neves Opposition Testimony
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2024 6:42:43 AM
Creation date
3/5/2024 1:51:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
3/4/2024
Other Parcel Numbers
950190150000, 024, 026, 030, 031, 033, 035; 96001001-003, 011-013; 960020080000, 037, 038, 041, 053
Permit Number
PL-SMA-2023-000046
Parcel Number
950190110000
Description
Opposition testimony
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
protect the environment; and provide affordable housing to meet the demand created by the <br /> development." <br /> Community trust in the developer has eroded as promises made in 2021 and proposed in <br /> earlier SMXs to fix and repair what is neglected and broken has not been completed or in some <br /> cases not started. <br /> Increased visitors and traffic will have adverse impacts especially along the shore and to <br /> endangered species and those engaging in traditional and customary practices. Most residents <br /> consider the beach areas over capacity now. Honu and honu'ea are increasingly impacted with <br /> hazards, harassment and polluted water. This development could double the impacts and <br /> diminish the bay's beauty and sense of place. <br /> There is a need for an updated SEIS with public review under the OEQC process. The <br /> last final EIS was completed in 1988 and much of the amended reviews offered by the developer <br /> are based on a DEIS 17 years ago which was abandoned before an FEIS was completed. Black <br /> Sands Beach, LLC needs to follow the precedent requiring a SEIS as prescribed by a Supreme <br /> Court ruling 4/8/2010 in the Unite Here v. City and County of Honolulu lawsuit. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Kinohi Neves <br /> kinohi7@hawaii.edu <br /> 3/4/2024 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.