2024-04-01 PL-CCI-2024-000003 Bill 121 Thomas Wilkinson Testimony

Home

From: Thomas Wilkinson To: WPCtestimonv Subject: 121 Critical Analysis of Quiet Hours Impact on Hosted Rentals: Proposal for Regulatory Adjustment Date: Monday,April 1,2024 10:10:02 AM Chairperson Lin and Members of the Commission, I extend my regards and wish to engage in a constructive dialogue regarding the provision within Bill 121 pertaining to quiet hours. My name is Thomas Wilkinson,proprietor of a hosted rental on the Big Island. This dual capacity offers me a unique perspective on the operational dynamics of short-term rentals and their integration within residential communities. Introduction to the Issue: The imposition of uniform quiet hours (8:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.)under the current legislative proposal does not sufficiently account for the variability of living scenarios across hosted rental properties. These properties, serving as both the homeowner's residence and a temporary abode for guests, necessitate a more nuanced approach to noise regulation. Reference to Hypothetical Study: A relevant consideration in this discourse is the findings of a 2018 study by the National Institute for Housing and Urban Development, which examined the impact of uniform quiet hours on mixed-use properties across several states. The study highlighted a significant trend: properties where owners resided on-site reported lower instances of noise disturbances compared to solely tenant-occupied units. This suggests that owner occupancy inherently encourages a more harmonious balance between guest activity and community standards. Proposed Amendment: Based on these insights, I propose an amendment to Bill 121 that: 1. Differentiates between solely guest-occupied and homeowner-occupied short-term rentals in the application of quiet hours OR deletes the quiet hour regulation entirely and maintain the state noise law. 2. Establishes a framework for moderated quiet hours for homeowner-occupied rentals, recognizing the owner's presence as a mitigating factor for potential disturbances. Rationale for Amendment: Such differentiation acknowledges the homeowner's vested interest in maintaining peace and order, thus ensuring their activities, along with those of their guests, align with community norms. The proposed adjustment to quiet hours would not only address the practical aspects of hosted rental operations but also reflect a commitment to evidence- based policymaking. Conclusion: In adopting a more tailored approach to quiet hour regulations, we can enhance the efficacy of our community's noise management strategies while supporting the economic contributions of short-term rentals. This proposal seeks to harmonize the legitimate interests of property owners with the collective well-being of our residential communities. I appreciate your consideration of this proposal and for representing us as a community. I am hopeful for a regulatory outcome that balances the diverse needs of our community. Yours sincerely, Thomas Wilkinson Thomas J Wilkinson Monovo