My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-04-04 Testimony Kristin Ofriel
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-05-02 Windward Continuance Meeting
>
#5 County Council Initiated - Bill 121 (PL-CCI-2024-000003)
>
Testimonies 03-27-2024 thru 04-30-2024
>
2024-04-04 Testimony Kristin Ofriel
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2024 12:38:44 PM
Creation date
5/1/2024 3:09:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Description
Testimony given at WPC 4-4-24 hearing
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
�d�y 00 V� lu, r <br />Chairman Dennis Lin <br />Windward Planning Commission <br />County of Hawai'i <br />25 Aupuni St. <br />Unit 1502 <br />Hilo, HI 96720 <br />Subject: Concerns and Recommendations Regarding Bill 121 <br />Aloha Chairman Lin and Windward Planning Commission Members, <br />I`%ri 5 <br />Thank you for your public service and for considering the viewpoints and concerns shared by <br />the community regarding Bill 121. <br />While I appreciate the hard work of the Council members who drafted the bill, and the stated <br />intent of the bill, I have deep concerns that the proposed legislation fails to consider how it will <br />impact the economic well-being of Big Island residents in practice. <br />Recommendation #1: Press pause and conduct an impact study <br />Tourism is Hawaii's principal industry and legislation that limits the ability of residents to <br />participate in this economy deserves a nuanced approach that acknowledges and equitably <br />accounts for the unique circumstances that exist across diverse regions of our island. Even well- <br />intentioned legislation can have far-reaching unintended consequences. This would also give <br />affected communities an opportunity to provide meaningful input proactively rather than <br />reactively. To my knowledge, no public input was invited during the drafting of this legislation. <br />Recommendation #2: Maintain the present definition of short term { transient as thirty <br />consecutive days or less <br />Owners who rent their homes legally for 31 days or more have a vested right to continue this <br />existing use. Changing the definition to 180 days would require creating an avenue for existing <br />rentals to apply for nonconforming use certification. Instead of creating additional administration <br />for an already complex and cumbersome set of provisions. I support upholding the present <br />definition of short-term/transient to be a rental period of thirty consecutive days or less. <br />Recommendation #3: Remove restrictions about where hosts can live and where guests <br />can stay <br />Hosts rely on rental income for their livelihood—they use it to pay their rent, mortgage, <br />medical bills, an empty nester may have college tuition to cover—any number of financial <br />hardships could give a host cause to move into a secondary dwelling in order to rent out the <br />primary home. Regulating which permissible residential dwelling can be occupied by a host <br />.d 8t mtg by <br />'d Read <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.